Systematic Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Central Vascular Access Device Securement

Q3 Medicine
Jon A. Bell, Michelle L Hawes, Emily Diloreto, S. M. Gibson
{"title":"Systematic Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Central Vascular Access Device Securement","authors":"Jon A. Bell, Michelle L Hawes, Emily Diloreto, S. M. Gibson","doi":"10.2309/java-d-22-00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Central vascular access devices (CVADs) are essential for patient care in modern medicine. Providing access to the central circulation, CVADs allow fluids and medications to be infused rapidly and hemodiluted. The placement of a CVAD requires knowledge of vascular access devices, optimal site selection, infection prevention protocols, and expert techniques to limit potential adverse outcomes. Research has been focused on how to safely and effectively place CVADs, but little effort has been made to investigate the securement of the catheter once it is in place.\n \n \n \n This systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and registered through PROSPERO. Two systematic searches of the literature were conducted, the first in January 2021 and the second in January 2022, by using multiple medical databases. Of the 1127 titles that met initial inclusion criteria 117 were selected for evaluation and then 39 for study.\n \n \n \n Search results yielded various outcomes, making a direct comparison between studies challenging. However, it was clear that safety and efficacy were not applied to suture-based securement and have not been well researched despite its general use.\n \n \n \n Randomized controlled studies are needed to measure the relative safety and efficacy of different securement modalities, their impact on CVAD complications, and ultimately patient outcomes.\n \n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-22-00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Central vascular access devices (CVADs) are essential for patient care in modern medicine. Providing access to the central circulation, CVADs allow fluids and medications to be infused rapidly and hemodiluted. The placement of a CVAD requires knowledge of vascular access devices, optimal site selection, infection prevention protocols, and expert techniques to limit potential adverse outcomes. Research has been focused on how to safely and effectively place CVADs, but little effort has been made to investigate the securement of the catheter once it is in place. This systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and registered through PROSPERO. Two systematic searches of the literature were conducted, the first in January 2021 and the second in January 2022, by using multiple medical databases. Of the 1127 titles that met initial inclusion criteria 117 were selected for evaluation and then 39 for study. Search results yielded various outcomes, making a direct comparison between studies challenging. However, it was clear that safety and efficacy were not applied to suture-based securement and have not been well researched despite its general use. Randomized controlled studies are needed to measure the relative safety and efficacy of different securement modalities, their impact on CVAD complications, and ultimately patient outcomes.
中心血管通路装置固定安全性和有效性的系统评价
中枢血管通路装置(CVADs)是现代医学中必不可少的病人护理设备。通过进入中央循环,CVADs可以快速输注液体和药物并稀释血液。放置CVAD需要了解血管通路装置、最佳位置选择、感染预防方案和专家技术,以限制潜在的不良后果。研究一直集中在如何安全有效地放置cvad上,但很少有人研究导管就位后的安全性。本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行,并通过PROSPERO注册。通过使用多个医学数据库,对文献进行了两次系统检索,第一次在2021年1月,第二次在2022年1月。在符合最初纳入标准的1127篇文献中,117篇被选中进行评价,39篇被选中进行研究。搜索结果产生了各种各样的结果,使得研究之间的直接比较具有挑战性。然而,很明显,安全性和有效性并不适用于缝合为基础的安全,并没有得到很好的研究,尽管它的普遍使用。需要随机对照研究来衡量不同安全方式的相对安全性和有效性,它们对CVAD并发症的影响,以及最终的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信