Calisthenics versus Pilates training on glycemic control and body fat in overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus

IF 0.4 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kinjol Kamat, V. Kage, Sherin Sequeira
{"title":"Calisthenics versus Pilates training on glycemic control and body fat in overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus","authors":"Kinjol Kamat, V. Kage, Sherin Sequeira","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Physical activity plays an important role in management and preventing complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Effectiveness of Pilates on DM showed that there was improvement in glucose control. Presently, resistance training forms are becoming very popular for weight loss and DM. Calisthenics is a relatively new form of resistance exercise training that has been less studied in obese and diabetic individuals. STUDY PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of Calisthenics and Pilates training approaches on percentage body fat and glycemic control (HbA1C, Post Prandial Blood Glucose (PPBG)) in overweight individuals with type 2 Diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Thirty (n = 30) over weight individuals with type 2 DM with HbA1C levels >6.5% were recruited for the study. The participants were randomly allocated to calisthenics (CG) and Pilates (PG) study groups who received respective exercise interventions for 12 weeks. The outcome measures were HbA1C, PPBG and percentage body fat assessed at pre and post intervention. RESULTS: Both CG and PG study groups showed statistically significant difference for glycemic control (HbA1C, PPBG) post 12 week intervention. However, significant improvement was noted in CG than PG in terms of HbA1c (p = 0.03), PPBG (P = 0.01) and body fat percentage (p <  0.0001). CONCLUSION: Calisthenics exercise training was more effective than the Pilates training in achieving long term (HbA1c) and post meal (PPBS) glycemic control with significant reduction in body fat percentage in overweight individuals with type 2 DM.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity plays an important role in management and preventing complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Effectiveness of Pilates on DM showed that there was improvement in glucose control. Presently, resistance training forms are becoming very popular for weight loss and DM. Calisthenics is a relatively new form of resistance exercise training that has been less studied in obese and diabetic individuals. STUDY PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of Calisthenics and Pilates training approaches on percentage body fat and glycemic control (HbA1C, Post Prandial Blood Glucose (PPBG)) in overweight individuals with type 2 Diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Thirty (n = 30) over weight individuals with type 2 DM with HbA1C levels >6.5% were recruited for the study. The participants were randomly allocated to calisthenics (CG) and Pilates (PG) study groups who received respective exercise interventions for 12 weeks. The outcome measures were HbA1C, PPBG and percentage body fat assessed at pre and post intervention. RESULTS: Both CG and PG study groups showed statistically significant difference for glycemic control (HbA1C, PPBG) post 12 week intervention. However, significant improvement was noted in CG than PG in terms of HbA1c (p = 0.03), PPBG (P = 0.01) and body fat percentage (p <  0.0001). CONCLUSION: Calisthenics exercise training was more effective than the Pilates training in achieving long term (HbA1c) and post meal (PPBS) glycemic control with significant reduction in body fat percentage in overweight individuals with type 2 DM.
健美操与普拉提训练对超重2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和体脂的影响
背景:体育活动在2型糖尿病(DM)的管理和预防并发症中起着重要作用。普拉提对糖尿病的疗效显示血糖控制有改善。目前,阻力训练形式在减肥和糖尿病中变得非常流行。健美操是一种相对较新的阻力训练形式,在肥胖和糖尿病患者中研究较少。研究目的:评估和比较健美术和普拉提训练方法对超重2型糖尿病(DM)患者体脂百分比和血糖控制(HbA1C、餐后血糖(PPBG))的影响。方法:研究招募了30例(n = 30)超重的2型糖尿病患者,HbA1C水平为bb0 6.5%。参与者被随机分配到健美操(CG)和普拉提(PG)研究组,分别接受12周的运动干预。结果测量是干预前后评估的HbA1C、PPBG和体脂百分比。结果:CG组和PG组干预12周后血糖控制(HbA1C、PPBG)差异有统计学意义。然而,在HbA1c (p = 0.03)、PPBG (p = 0.01)和体脂率(p < 0.0001)方面,CG比PG有显著改善。结论:在超重2型糖尿病患者中,健美体运动训练比普拉提训练更有效地实现长期(HbA1c)和餐后(PPBS)血糖控制,并显著降低体脂率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信