New Constitutionalism and the EU: Its Limits and Prospects beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Stephen Gill, Thibault Biscahie
{"title":"New Constitutionalism and the EU: Its Limits and Prospects beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Stephen Gill, Thibault Biscahie","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2022.2129925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A key question for today is how far the apparent loosening of austerity following the COVID-19 pandemic in the form of the July 2020 European Recovery Plan of 750 billion euros, constitutes a first step towards debt mutualization (sharing of debts to fund recovery among EU Member States) but also whether it signals a move away from the neoliberal legal and political limits associated with neoliberal new constitutionalism measures, epitomized in the EU by the Maastricht Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact. We think this prospect is unlikely – in the absence of significant political pressures demanding and creating alternative futures and promoting radical change. In lieu of paradigmatic change, Next Generation EU resembles a pragmatic shift – with indeed some innovative traits – triggered by two main motives: responding to the urgent pandemic shock, but most importantly tackling the lasting effects of economic and political imbalances, in an attempt to tame some of the socio-political tensions and risks of disintegration resulting from the mismanaged Eurozone crisis.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"44 1","pages":"524 - 544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2129925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract A key question for today is how far the apparent loosening of austerity following the COVID-19 pandemic in the form of the July 2020 European Recovery Plan of 750 billion euros, constitutes a first step towards debt mutualization (sharing of debts to fund recovery among EU Member States) but also whether it signals a move away from the neoliberal legal and political limits associated with neoliberal new constitutionalism measures, epitomized in the EU by the Maastricht Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact. We think this prospect is unlikely – in the absence of significant political pressures demanding and creating alternative futures and promoting radical change. In lieu of paradigmatic change, Next Generation EU resembles a pragmatic shift – with indeed some innovative traits – triggered by two main motives: responding to the urgent pandemic shock, but most importantly tackling the lasting effects of economic and political imbalances, in an attempt to tame some of the socio-political tensions and risks of disintegration resulting from the mismanaged Eurozone crisis.
新宪政与欧盟:新冠肺炎疫情后的局限与前景
今天的一个关键问题是,在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,以2020年7月7500亿欧元的欧洲复苏计划的形式出现的明显放松紧缩政策,在多大程度上构成了迈向债务共同化(欧盟成员国之间分担债务以资助复苏)的第一步,以及它是否标志着与新自由主义新宪政措施相关的新自由主义法律和政治限制的转变。以《马斯特里赫特条约》和《稳定与增长公约》为代表。我们认为,如果没有重大的政治压力要求和创造替代未来,并推动彻底变革,这种前景不太可能出现。“下一代欧盟”与其说是范式变革,不如说是一种务实的转变——确实有一些创新特征——由两个主要动机引发:应对紧迫的流行病冲击,但最重要的是解决经济和政治失衡的持久影响,试图缓和因欧元区危机管理不善而导致的一些社会政治紧张局势和解体风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信