Comparing the effect of myofascial release and muscle energy technique on craniovertebral angle and headache in tension type headache patients

Q4 Health Professions
Ankita Sharma, Ankita Sharma, M. Rizvi, S. Kumari, Pooja Sharma
{"title":"Comparing the effect of myofascial release and muscle energy technique on craniovertebral angle and headache in tension type headache patients","authors":"Ankita Sharma, Ankita Sharma, M. Rizvi, S. Kumari, Pooja Sharma","doi":"10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2022.e4463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Tension headaches can be induced by forward head posture, and there is a wealth of evidence available for managing chronic headaches. The data supports the use of manual therapy approaches to manage tension type headaches. Because of the forward head posture, the suboccipital muscle region becomes short, resulting in an increase in lordosis and neck pain. Patients with an even more forward head posture have a smaller cranio-vertebral angle, which in turn causes tension type headache. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Myofascial release therapy(MFR) and Muscle energy technique(MET) with general neck exercises on the cranio-vertebral angle and headache in tension type headache patients. METHODS: In total, 75 subjects with tension type headache and suboccipital muscle tenderness were recruited and randomized blindly into three groups: the MFR group, the MET group, and the control group (25 subjects in each group). A pre-craniovertebral angle was taken by photographic method, and a pre-headache disability index questionnaire was filled in. The MFR group receives cranio-basal release in the suboccipital region with neck exercises, the MET group receives post–isometric relaxation in the suboccipital region with exercises, and the control group receives only exercises for 2 weeks. After two weeks, the postcranial angle and the headache questionnaire were taken and measured. RESULTS: Craniovertebral angle and headache index showed significant improvement in both the MET and MFR groups. There was no significant difference when MET and MFR groups were compared. When compared with the control group, both MET and MFR showed a significant increase in craniovertebral angle. There was significant improvement in the headache index following MET, MFR, or routine neck exercise. CONCLUSION: Compared to the control group, MFR shows better results than MET on craniovertebral angle and headache.","PeriodicalId":36370,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2022.e4463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tension headaches can be induced by forward head posture, and there is a wealth of evidence available for managing chronic headaches. The data supports the use of manual therapy approaches to manage tension type headaches. Because of the forward head posture, the suboccipital muscle region becomes short, resulting in an increase in lordosis and neck pain. Patients with an even more forward head posture have a smaller cranio-vertebral angle, which in turn causes tension type headache. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Myofascial release therapy(MFR) and Muscle energy technique(MET) with general neck exercises on the cranio-vertebral angle and headache in tension type headache patients. METHODS: In total, 75 subjects with tension type headache and suboccipital muscle tenderness were recruited and randomized blindly into three groups: the MFR group, the MET group, and the control group (25 subjects in each group). A pre-craniovertebral angle was taken by photographic method, and a pre-headache disability index questionnaire was filled in. The MFR group receives cranio-basal release in the suboccipital region with neck exercises, the MET group receives post–isometric relaxation in the suboccipital region with exercises, and the control group receives only exercises for 2 weeks. After two weeks, the postcranial angle and the headache questionnaire were taken and measured. RESULTS: Craniovertebral angle and headache index showed significant improvement in both the MET and MFR groups. There was no significant difference when MET and MFR groups were compared. When compared with the control group, both MET and MFR showed a significant increase in craniovertebral angle. There was significant improvement in the headache index following MET, MFR, or routine neck exercise. CONCLUSION: Compared to the control group, MFR shows better results than MET on craniovertebral angle and headache.
肌筋膜松解与肌能技术对紧张型头痛患者颅椎角及头痛影响的比较
引言:紧张性头痛可由头部前倾引起,有大量证据可用于治疗慢性头痛。这些数据支持使用手动治疗方法来治疗紧张型头痛。由于头部前倾,枕下肌肉区域变短,导致前凸和颈部疼痛增加。头部姿势更靠前的患者的颅椎角更小,这反过来会导致紧张型头痛。目的:比较肌筋膜松解疗法(MFR)和肌肉能量技术(MET)与一般颈部锻炼对紧张型头痛患者的颅椎角和头痛的影响。方法:共招募75名紧张型头痛和枕下肌压痛的受试者,并将其随机分为三组:MFR组、MET组和对照组(每组25名受试者)。采用摄影法拍摄颅椎前角,并填写头痛前残疾指数问卷。MFR组在枕下区域进行颅底松解,并进行颈部锻炼,MET组在枕下部区域进行等长后放松,并进行锻炼,对照组仅进行为期2周的锻炼。两周后,采集并测量颅后角和头痛问卷。结果:MET组和MFR组的颅椎角和头痛指数均有显著改善。MET组与MFR组比较无显著性差异。与对照组相比,MET和MFR均显示出颅椎角的显著增加。MET、MFR或常规颈部运动后头痛指数有显著改善。结论:与对照组相比,MFR对颅椎角和头痛的疗效优于MET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信