Mothers’ satisfaction with distraction as a postoperative pain management intervention for their child: An interventional study

Q3 Nursing
E. Mathias, M. Pai, V. Kumar, V. Guddattu, A‐C Bramhagen
{"title":"Mothers’ satisfaction with distraction as a postoperative pain management intervention for their child: An interventional study","authors":"E. Mathias, M. Pai, V. Kumar, V. Guddattu, A‐C Bramhagen","doi":"10.26550/2209-1092.1206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to investigate mothers’ levels of satisfaction with distraction as a post-operative pain management intervention for their child. Background: Although the number of studies on paediatric pain management has increased over time, research into non-pharmacological post-operative pain management remains inadequate, indicating that more research is required. Design: A posttest-only control group design was adopted to measure mothers’ levels of satisfaction with distraction as a non-pharmacological post-operative pain management intervention for their child. Methods: The study included 160 mothers and their children undergoing elective surgery in a paediatric surgical unit. Mothers and children were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups (80 intervention, 80 control). The children in the intervention group received age-appropriate distraction interventions for three post-operative days along with the usual care. Children in the control group received only usual care. Data on parental satisfaction with pain management interventions was assessed on the day of discharge using a parental satisfaction questionnaire. Results: In the intervention group 48 mothers (60%) were ‘very satisfied’ and 22 mothers (40%) were ‘moderately satisfied’ with pain management interventions for their child. In the control group 27 mothers (34%) were ‘very satisfied’ and 53 (66%) were ‘moderately satisfied. The mean and standard deviation of mother’s satisfaction in the intervention group and control group was 42 ±5.23 and 34 ± 6.64 respectively. The present study identified that there was a significant difference in the level of mother’s satisfaction between the intervention and control groups (p<.05). Conclusion: The level of satisfaction with pain management intervention for their child was higher for mothers in the intervention group that the control group. The distraction intervention provided for the children during the post-operative period improved the mothers’ satisfaction level.","PeriodicalId":37332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perioperative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perioperative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate mothers’ levels of satisfaction with distraction as a post-operative pain management intervention for their child. Background: Although the number of studies on paediatric pain management has increased over time, research into non-pharmacological post-operative pain management remains inadequate, indicating that more research is required. Design: A posttest-only control group design was adopted to measure mothers’ levels of satisfaction with distraction as a non-pharmacological post-operative pain management intervention for their child. Methods: The study included 160 mothers and their children undergoing elective surgery in a paediatric surgical unit. Mothers and children were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups (80 intervention, 80 control). The children in the intervention group received age-appropriate distraction interventions for three post-operative days along with the usual care. Children in the control group received only usual care. Data on parental satisfaction with pain management interventions was assessed on the day of discharge using a parental satisfaction questionnaire. Results: In the intervention group 48 mothers (60%) were ‘very satisfied’ and 22 mothers (40%) were ‘moderately satisfied’ with pain management interventions for their child. In the control group 27 mothers (34%) were ‘very satisfied’ and 53 (66%) were ‘moderately satisfied. The mean and standard deviation of mother’s satisfaction in the intervention group and control group was 42 ±5.23 and 34 ± 6.64 respectively. The present study identified that there was a significant difference in the level of mother’s satisfaction between the intervention and control groups (p<.05). Conclusion: The level of satisfaction with pain management intervention for their child was higher for mothers in the intervention group that the control group. The distraction intervention provided for the children during the post-operative period improved the mothers’ satisfaction level.
母亲对分心作为孩子术后疼痛管理干预的满意度:一项干预研究
目的:本研究旨在调查母亲对分心作为孩子术后疼痛管理干预措施的满意度。背景:尽管儿科疼痛管理研究的数量随着时间的推移而增加,但对非药物术后疼痛管理的研究仍然不足,这表明还需要更多的研究。设计:采用仅测试后的对照组设计来测量母亲对分心的满意度,作为对孩子的非药物术后疼痛管理干预。方法:该研究包括160名在儿科手术室接受选择性手术的母亲及其子女。母亲和儿童被随机分配到干预组和对照组(80个干预组,80个对照组)。干预组的儿童在术后三天接受了与年龄相适应的分心干预,并接受了常规护理。对照组的儿童只接受常规护理。出院当天使用父母满意度调查表评估父母对疼痛管理干预措施的满意度数据。结果:在干预组中,48名母亲(60%)对孩子的疼痛管理干预措施“非常满意”,22名母亲(40%)“适度满意”。在对照组中,27位母亲(34%)表示“非常满意”,53位母亲(66%)表示“中等满意”。干预组和对照组母亲满意度的平均值和标准差分别为42±5.23和34±6.64。本研究发现,干预组和对照组的母亲满意度存在显著差异(p<0.05)。结论:干预组母亲对孩子疼痛管理干预的满意度高于对照组。术后阶段为孩子提供的分心干预提高了母亲的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perioperative Nursing
Journal of Perioperative Nursing Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信