A practical application of statistical process control to evaluate the performance rate of academic programmes: implications and suggestions

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Gessa, Eyda Marin, Pilar Sancha
{"title":"A practical application of statistical process control to evaluate the performance rate of academic programmes: implications and suggestions","authors":"A. Gessa, Eyda Marin, Pilar Sancha","doi":"10.1108/qae-03-2022-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to properly and objectively assess the students’ study progress in bachelor programmes by applying statistical process control (SPC). Specifically, the authors focused their analysis on the variation in performance rates in business studies courses taught at a Spanish University.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative methodology was used, using an action-based case study developed in a public university. Previous research and theoretical issues related to quality indicators of the training programmes were discussed, followed by the application of SPC to assess these outputs.\n\n\nFindings\nThe evaluation of the performance rate of the courses that comprised the training programs through the SPC revealed significant differences with respect to the evaluations obtained through traditional evaluation procedures. Similarly, the results show differences in the control parameters (central line and control interval), depending on the adopted approach (by programmes, by academic year and by department).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study has inherent limitations linked to both the methodology and selection of data sources.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe SPC approach provides a framework to properly and objectively assess the quality indicators involved in quality assurance processes in higher education.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper contributes to the discourse on the importance of a robust and effective assessment of quality indicators of the academic curriculum in the higher education context through the application of quality control tools such as SPC.\n","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-03-2022-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to properly and objectively assess the students’ study progress in bachelor programmes by applying statistical process control (SPC). Specifically, the authors focused their analysis on the variation in performance rates in business studies courses taught at a Spanish University. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative methodology was used, using an action-based case study developed in a public university. Previous research and theoretical issues related to quality indicators of the training programmes were discussed, followed by the application of SPC to assess these outputs. Findings The evaluation of the performance rate of the courses that comprised the training programs through the SPC revealed significant differences with respect to the evaluations obtained through traditional evaluation procedures. Similarly, the results show differences in the control parameters (central line and control interval), depending on the adopted approach (by programmes, by academic year and by department). Research limitations/implications This study has inherent limitations linked to both the methodology and selection of data sources. Practical implications The SPC approach provides a framework to properly and objectively assess the quality indicators involved in quality assurance processes in higher education. Originality/value This paper contributes to the discourse on the importance of a robust and effective assessment of quality indicators of the academic curriculum in the higher education context through the application of quality control tools such as SPC.
统计过程控制在评估学术课程绩效方面的实际应用:启示和建议
目的本研究旨在运用统计过程控制(SPC)方法,正确、客观地评估学生在学士课程中的学习进度。具体而言,作者将他们的分析重点放在西班牙大学商业研究课程中表现率的变化上。设计/方法/方法使用了一种定性方法,使用了一所公立大学开发的基于行动的案例研究。讨论了以往与培训方案质量指标有关的研究和理论问题,然后应用SPC来评估这些产出。结果通过SPC对包括培训项目的课程的绩效率进行的评估显示,与通过传统评估程序获得的评估相比,存在显著差异。同样,研究结果显示,控制参数(中心线和控制区间)存在差异,这取决于所采用的方法(按课程、学年和院系)。研究局限性/含义本研究在方法和数据源选择方面都存在固有局限性。实践意义SPC方法为正确客观地评估高等教育质量保证过程中涉及的质量指标提供了一个框架。原创性/价值本文通过应用SPC等质量控制工具,有助于讨论在高等教育背景下对学术课程质量指标进行稳健有效评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信