Three Loves for Three Oranges: Gozzi, Meyerhold, Prokofiev Edited by Dassia N. Posner and Kevin Bartig with Maria De Simone. Russian Music Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2021; pp. xxxi + 427, 61 illustrations. $50 cloth, $49.99 e-book.

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Olga S. Partan
{"title":"Three Loves for Three Oranges: Gozzi, Meyerhold, Prokofiev Edited by Dassia N. Posner and Kevin Bartig with Maria De Simone. Russian Music Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2021; pp. xxxi + 427, 61 illustrations. $50 cloth, $49.99 e-book.","authors":"Olga S. Partan","doi":"10.1017/s0040557422000370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"actresses Phillips examines in previous chapters. A short Conclusion follows up with productive comparisons between past and present celebrity pregnancies. Phillips gives us more than the usual “learn from the past” history-teacher didactics, however; she reinforces the importance of taking seriously celebrity as a cultural indicator of what matters then and now. She also gives us a methodology for reading archival evidence of past celebrity performances alongside the ephemeral performances and archival data of the present. Anchoring our readings of both archive and performance in the functions and needs of the human body, Phillips claims that“[t]he essential needs of the reproducing body— space, access, rest—have not changed, and embodied experience today can inform our sense of its history” (216). This is not to say that Phillips essentializes the reproductive female body; rather, she reads it as a part of the complex workings we call culture. Phillips reveals an eighteenth-century theatre industry that assumed their female stars would be pregnant at times during their careers and adjusted to that fact, offering women paid time off, shorter hours, and generally what we might today call accommodations. These conditions make the present working conditions of women in theatre, as Phillips summarizes them, look pretty lousy. The body— including that troublesome body part, the uterus—is integral to what Tschida calls the “life or well-being” of women, not just as childbearers, but as workers. This book makes it clear that how we attend to the body and its needs is not just a matter of individual well-being. It is also integral to the health of the body politic.","PeriodicalId":42777,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE SURVEY","volume":"64 1","pages":"95 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE SURVEY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0040557422000370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

actresses Phillips examines in previous chapters. A short Conclusion follows up with productive comparisons between past and present celebrity pregnancies. Phillips gives us more than the usual “learn from the past” history-teacher didactics, however; she reinforces the importance of taking seriously celebrity as a cultural indicator of what matters then and now. She also gives us a methodology for reading archival evidence of past celebrity performances alongside the ephemeral performances and archival data of the present. Anchoring our readings of both archive and performance in the functions and needs of the human body, Phillips claims that“[t]he essential needs of the reproducing body— space, access, rest—have not changed, and embodied experience today can inform our sense of its history” (216). This is not to say that Phillips essentializes the reproductive female body; rather, she reads it as a part of the complex workings we call culture. Phillips reveals an eighteenth-century theatre industry that assumed their female stars would be pregnant at times during their careers and adjusted to that fact, offering women paid time off, shorter hours, and generally what we might today call accommodations. These conditions make the present working conditions of women in theatre, as Phillips summarizes them, look pretty lousy. The body— including that troublesome body part, the uterus—is integral to what Tschida calls the “life or well-being” of women, not just as childbearers, but as workers. This book makes it clear that how we attend to the body and its needs is not just a matter of individual well-being. It is also integral to the health of the body politic.
《三个橙子的三种爱:戈齐、梅耶尔霍尔德、普罗科菲耶夫》,Dassia N.Posner编辑,Kevin Bartig与Maria De Simone合作。俄罗斯音乐研究。布卢明顿:印第安纳大学出版社,2021;xxxi+427页,61幅插图$50块布,49.99美元的电子书。
菲利普斯在前几章中研究过的女演员。在简短的结论之后,对过去和现在的名人怀孕进行了富有成效的比较。然而,菲利普斯给了我们比通常的“从过去学习”历史教师的教学更多的东西;她强调了认真对待名人作为当时和现在重要事物的文化指标的重要性。她还为我们提供了一种方法来解读过去名人表演的档案证据,以及当下的短暂表演和档案数据。菲利普斯将我们对档案和表演的解读锚定在人体的功能和需求上,他声称“复制身体的基本需求——空间、通道、休息——并没有改变,今天具体化的体验可以告诉我们它的历史感”(216)。这并不是说菲利普斯将生殖女性的身体本质化了;相反,她将其解读为我们称之为文化的复杂运作的一部分。菲利普斯揭示了18世纪的戏剧行业,他们认为女明星在她们的职业生涯中有时会怀孕,并根据这一事实进行调整,为女性提供带薪休假,缩短工作时间,以及我们今天所说的一般住宿。正如菲利普斯总结的那样,这些条件使得剧院女性目前的工作条件看起来相当糟糕。身体——包括那个麻烦的身体部位——子宫——是Tschida所说的女性“生活或幸福”的组成部分,不仅是作为生育者,也是作为工作者。这本书清楚地表明,我们如何照顾身体及其需求不仅仅是个人幸福的问题。它也是国家健康的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THEATRE SURVEY
THEATRE SURVEY THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信