PLATFORMISATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS: DOES USE OF THE SLOVENIAN #OSTANIZDRAV APP BYPASS PRIVACY RIGHTS?

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Maruška Nardoni, Franc Mali
{"title":"PLATFORMISATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS:\nDOES USE OF THE SLOVENIAN #OSTANIZDRAV APP\nBYPASS PRIVACY RIGHTS?","authors":"Maruška Nardoni, Franc Mali","doi":"10.51936/tip.58.specialissue.536-554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The article aims to explore the public’s fear of data being misused when using European Covid-19 contact-tracing applications. The point of departure lies in considering the research question of whether the Covid-19 pandemic has influenced the platformisation of traditional institutions, i.e., whether the design of Europe’s proximity-tracing applications mimic the dataintensive web services of commercial platforms, namely commercial APIs and their data policies, in order to bypass the right to privacy. We accordingly argue that is vital to address the public’s fears of governmental and corporate dataveillance as well as data misuse while using such apps. The investigation entails of a critical analysis of the Exposure Notification System framework designed by Apple and Google (or GAEN) and the #OstaniZdrav application. The article rejects the justification of the public’s fear of governmental dataveillance, while recognising the possibility of corporate data misuse. Keywords: Covid-19 contact-tracing application, right to privacy, GDPR, API, protocol, metadata, dataveillance","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.58.specialissue.536-554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The article aims to explore the public’s fear of data being misused when using European Covid-19 contact-tracing applications. The point of departure lies in considering the research question of whether the Covid-19 pandemic has influenced the platformisation of traditional institutions, i.e., whether the design of Europe’s proximity-tracing applications mimic the dataintensive web services of commercial platforms, namely commercial APIs and their data policies, in order to bypass the right to privacy. We accordingly argue that is vital to address the public’s fears of governmental and corporate dataveillance as well as data misuse while using such apps. The investigation entails of a critical analysis of the Exposure Notification System framework designed by Apple and Google (or GAEN) and the #OstaniZdrav application. The article rejects the justification of the public’s fear of governmental dataveillance, while recognising the possibility of corporate data misuse. Keywords: Covid-19 contact-tracing application, right to privacy, GDPR, API, protocol, metadata, dataveillance
平台化与人权:斯洛文尼亚# ostanizdrav应用的使用是否绕过隐私权?
摘要这篇文章旨在探讨公众在使用欧洲Covid-19接触者追踪应用程序时对数据被滥用的恐惧。出发点在于考虑新冠疫情是否影响了传统机构的平台化这一研究问题,即欧洲的邻近追踪应用程序的设计是否模仿了商业平台的数据密集型web服务,即商业api及其数据政策,以绕过隐私权。因此,我们认为,这对于解决公众在使用此类应用程序时对政府和企业数据监控以及数据滥用的担忧至关重要。调查需要对苹果和b谷歌(或GAEN)设计的曝光通知系统框架以及#OstaniZdrav应用程序进行批判性分析。这篇文章驳斥了公众担心政府数据监控的理由,同时承认了企业滥用数据的可能性。关键词:Covid-19接触者追踪应用、隐私权、GDPR、API、协议、元数据、数据监控
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信