Jonathan A. Saenger, J. Atamaniuk, M. Gaggl, Johannes Asenbaum, Florian A. Huber, A. Grieb, M. Födinger
{"title":"Increased hemolysis rate in plasma tubes after implementation of a fully automated sample delivery and acceptance system","authors":"Jonathan A. Saenger, J. Atamaniuk, M. Gaggl, Johannes Asenbaum, Florian A. Huber, A. Grieb, M. Födinger","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2022-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Automated sample delivery and laboratory acceptance systems (PTAS) may influence the hemolysis rate of blood samples due to g-forces, abrupt acceleration, and rapid deceleration. However, quantitative data regarding the rate of hemolysis in PTAS is limited. To fill this void, the effect of a pneumatic tube in combination with an acceptance system (PTAS) on the hemolysis rate was investigated in this study. Methods Lithium heparin plasma tubes were transported from different clinical departments to the hospital’s laboratory (a) by employees or (b) with an automated PTAS and analyzed for the presence of hemolysis based on a hemolysis index (HI) of >25. Hemolysis indices of 68.513 samples were retrieved from the laboratory information system before and after installation of the PTAS and were subjected to statistical analysis. Results A total of 32.614 samples were transported by employees, of which 3.815 samples (11.70%) were hemolytic, and 9.441 out of 35.899 samples delivered by PTAS (26.30%) were hemolytic. After the implementation of the PTAS, hemolysis rates increased in all departments. Conclusions Automated PTAS are associated with increased hemolysis rates. This has implications for routine patient management and should be considered for the transportation of samples used for the determination of hemolysis-sensitive laboratory parameters.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"63 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Automated sample delivery and laboratory acceptance systems (PTAS) may influence the hemolysis rate of blood samples due to g-forces, abrupt acceleration, and rapid deceleration. However, quantitative data regarding the rate of hemolysis in PTAS is limited. To fill this void, the effect of a pneumatic tube in combination with an acceptance system (PTAS) on the hemolysis rate was investigated in this study. Methods Lithium heparin plasma tubes were transported from different clinical departments to the hospital’s laboratory (a) by employees or (b) with an automated PTAS and analyzed for the presence of hemolysis based on a hemolysis index (HI) of >25. Hemolysis indices of 68.513 samples were retrieved from the laboratory information system before and after installation of the PTAS and were subjected to statistical analysis. Results A total of 32.614 samples were transported by employees, of which 3.815 samples (11.70%) were hemolytic, and 9.441 out of 35.899 samples delivered by PTAS (26.30%) were hemolytic. After the implementation of the PTAS, hemolysis rates increased in all departments. Conclusions Automated PTAS are associated with increased hemolysis rates. This has implications for routine patient management and should be considered for the transportation of samples used for the determination of hemolysis-sensitive laboratory parameters.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.