Silent Traces and Deserted Places

Aimée Joyce
{"title":"Silent Traces and Deserted Places","authors":"Aimée Joyce","doi":"10.23858/ethp.2021.42.2714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how silence is held and transmitted through the materiality of deserted and abandoned places along the Polish frontier; and the generative role that silencing plays in local practices of tolerance. The article discusses two specific sites of silence in a town on Poland’s eastern border. Both sites were abandoned or destroyed at the same time, and are part of a larger landscape of religious and ethnic conflict in the area. This history of conflict is managed through small everyday acts of forgetting, minimising and silencing. Yet, the two sites at the centre of this article demonstrate that silencing is an incomplete process. The fragmented materiality of the two places undercuts local silences, actively invoking experiences and memories of the Holocaust. The objects missing and present in these haunted places are too inconsequential to be considered ruins – one site is notable only because it is an empty field. Yet these sites and objects act as powerful silent traces. Traces, as Napolitano (2015) has observed, are knots of history with an ambiguous auratic presence, located between memory and forgetting, repression and amplification. Traces conjure that which we can and that which we cannot say. The deserted places of the town draw attention to the silences that conviviality is built upon. This article considers how paying close attention to the specific silences concerning ‘unthinkable’ histories can reveal the power relations embedded in the process of history making and community building not just nationally, but also at the local level (Trouillot 1995). ","PeriodicalId":34666,"journal":{"name":"Ethnologia Polona","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnologia Polona","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2021.42.2714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how silence is held and transmitted through the materiality of deserted and abandoned places along the Polish frontier; and the generative role that silencing plays in local practices of tolerance. The article discusses two specific sites of silence in a town on Poland’s eastern border. Both sites were abandoned or destroyed at the same time, and are part of a larger landscape of religious and ethnic conflict in the area. This history of conflict is managed through small everyday acts of forgetting, minimising and silencing. Yet, the two sites at the centre of this article demonstrate that silencing is an incomplete process. The fragmented materiality of the two places undercuts local silences, actively invoking experiences and memories of the Holocaust. The objects missing and present in these haunted places are too inconsequential to be considered ruins – one site is notable only because it is an empty field. Yet these sites and objects act as powerful silent traces. Traces, as Napolitano (2015) has observed, are knots of history with an ambiguous auratic presence, located between memory and forgetting, repression and amplification. Traces conjure that which we can and that which we cannot say. The deserted places of the town draw attention to the silences that conviviality is built upon. This article considers how paying close attention to the specific silences concerning ‘unthinkable’ histories can reveal the power relations embedded in the process of history making and community building not just nationally, but also at the local level (Trouillot 1995). 
寂静的痕迹和荒芜的地方
这篇文章探讨了沉默是如何通过波兰边境上被遗弃的地方的物质性来保持和传播的;以及沉默在当地宽容实践中所起的生成作用。这篇文章讨论了波兰东部边境一个城镇的两个特定的默哀地点。这两个遗址都是在同一时间被遗弃或摧毁的,是该地区宗教和种族冲突更大格局的一部分。这种冲突的历史是通过遗忘、最小化和沉默的日常小行为来管理的。然而,本文中心的两个地点表明,沉默是一个不完整的过程。这两个地方碎片化的物质性打破了当地的沉默,积极唤起人们对大屠杀的经历和记忆。在这些闹鬼的地方,丢失和存在的物品太无关紧要了,不能被认为是废墟——有一个地方之所以引人注目,只是因为它是一块空地。然而,这些地点和物品充当着强大的无声痕迹。正如纳波利塔诺(Napolitano, 2015)所观察到的,痕迹是历史的结,有着模糊的存在感,位于记忆与遗忘、压抑与放大之间。痕迹让我们想起我们能说的和不能说的。小镇上那些荒凉的地方让人们注意到建立在欢乐之上的寂静。本文认为,密切关注有关“不可想象”历史的特定沉默,可以揭示不仅在国家层面,而且在地方层面,历史创造和社区建设过程中嵌入的权力关系(Trouillot 1995)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信