Assessment of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections in the management of severe dry eye

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kareem B. Elessawy, A. Araissi, H. Nasr, S. Abdelbaky
{"title":"Assessment of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections in the management of severe dry eye","authors":"Kareem B. Elessawy, A. Araissi, H. Nasr, S. Abdelbaky","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_26_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection into the lacrimal gland in severe dry eye and to compare it with preservative-free artificial tears. Patients and methods This study included a total of 74 eyes of 40 patients divided into two groups. The intervention group received three PRP injections transcutaneously in the region of the lacrimal gland. The control group was treated with preservative-free artificial tears. Results The intervention group showed improvement in all measured parameters, except the Meibomian gland score, with a statistically significant improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score (P<0.001) and the Schirmer test (P=0.011) and less significant improvement in the ocular surface staining score (P=0.076) and tear breakup time (TBUT) (P=0.09). Compared with the control group, the PRP intervention group showed a statistically significant improvement in the OSDI score (P<0.001), the Schirmer test (P=0.005) and the ocular surface staining score (P=0.013) and less significant improvement in TBUT (P=0.2). Conclusion The use of PRP injections is safe and effective, with improvement in the OSDI, Schirmer test, and ocular surface staining and less improvement in TBUT, but it is not effective in improving Meibomian gland function.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_26_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection into the lacrimal gland in severe dry eye and to compare it with preservative-free artificial tears. Patients and methods This study included a total of 74 eyes of 40 patients divided into two groups. The intervention group received three PRP injections transcutaneously in the region of the lacrimal gland. The control group was treated with preservative-free artificial tears. Results The intervention group showed improvement in all measured parameters, except the Meibomian gland score, with a statistically significant improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score (P<0.001) and the Schirmer test (P=0.011) and less significant improvement in the ocular surface staining score (P=0.076) and tear breakup time (TBUT) (P=0.09). Compared with the control group, the PRP intervention group showed a statistically significant improvement in the OSDI score (P<0.001), the Schirmer test (P=0.005) and the ocular surface staining score (P=0.013) and less significant improvement in TBUT (P=0.2). Conclusion The use of PRP injections is safe and effective, with improvement in the OSDI, Schirmer test, and ocular surface staining and less improvement in TBUT, but it is not effective in improving Meibomian gland function.
富血小板血浆注射液治疗严重干眼症的疗效评估
目的本研究旨在评估泪腺内注射富含血小板血浆(PRP)治疗严重干眼症的疗效,并与不含防腐剂的人工泪液进行比较。患者和方法本研究共纳入74眼40例患者,分为两组。干预组在泪腺区域经皮注射三次PRP。对照组采用不含防腐剂的人工泪液进行治疗。结果干预组除睑板腺评分外,所有测量参数均有改善,眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分和Schirmer检验(P=0.011)均有统计学意义的改善,眼表面染色评分(P=0.076)和撕裂时间(TBUT)改善不太显著(P=0.09)。与对照组相比,PRP干预组的OSDI评分(P<0.001)、Schirmer检验(P=0.005)和眼表染色评分(P=0.013)均有统计学意义的改善,而TBUT的改善则不太显著(P=0.2),但对改善睑板腺功能无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信