Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Oman. Nine years’ study

Q4 Medicine
A. Abu-Heija, Majeda R. Al-Bash
{"title":"Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Oman. Nine years’ study","authors":"A. Abu-Heija, Majeda R. Al-Bash","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v56i4.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study risk factors, incidence, indications, maternal and perinatal complications of women who underwent emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) in Oman. \nMethod: This is a retrospective study, in which all cases EPH performed at SQUH between January 2007 and December 2016 were reviewed. \nResults: During the 9 years study period, there were 18 cases of EPH; the total number of deliveries during the same period was 32,963, so the incidence of EPH was 0.55 per 1,000 deliveries. Of all cases of EPH, 13 cases (72.2%) were cesarean hysterectomy compared with 5 cases (27.8%) were postpartum hysterectomy. Twelve cases (66.7%) were total hysterectomy while 6 cases (33.3%) were subtotal hysterectomy. The most common risk factor for EPH was placenta previa and accrete with previous cesarean section (CS) (27.6%); followed by previous CS without placenta previa (24.1%). The most common indication for EPH was placenta previa and accreta (44.4%), and previous CS (16.7%). During the study period, there was only one case of maternal death (5.6%). There were no cases of stillbirths or early neonatal deaths. There were 4 cases of bladder injury (22.2%). Women aged between 35-34 years and para > 5 had the highest incidence of EPH (50.0%). \nConclusion: To reduce the incidence of EPH and its catastrophic consequences, we need to identify high-risk cases ante-natally and potential cases for EPH should be booked early during pregnancy and managed during pregnancy and delivery at a tertiary hospital by an experienced team.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i4.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study risk factors, incidence, indications, maternal and perinatal complications of women who underwent emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) in Oman. Method: This is a retrospective study, in which all cases EPH performed at SQUH between January 2007 and December 2016 were reviewed. Results: During the 9 years study period, there were 18 cases of EPH; the total number of deliveries during the same period was 32,963, so the incidence of EPH was 0.55 per 1,000 deliveries. Of all cases of EPH, 13 cases (72.2%) were cesarean hysterectomy compared with 5 cases (27.8%) were postpartum hysterectomy. Twelve cases (66.7%) were total hysterectomy while 6 cases (33.3%) were subtotal hysterectomy. The most common risk factor for EPH was placenta previa and accrete with previous cesarean section (CS) (27.6%); followed by previous CS without placenta previa (24.1%). The most common indication for EPH was placenta previa and accreta (44.4%), and previous CS (16.7%). During the study period, there was only one case of maternal death (5.6%). There were no cases of stillbirths or early neonatal deaths. There were 4 cases of bladder injury (22.2%). Women aged between 35-34 years and para > 5 had the highest incidence of EPH (50.0%). Conclusion: To reduce the incidence of EPH and its catastrophic consequences, we need to identify high-risk cases ante-natally and potential cases for EPH should be booked early during pregnancy and managed during pregnancy and delivery at a tertiary hospital by an experienced team.
阿曼苏丹卡布斯大学医院急诊围产期子宫切除术。九年的研究
目的:研究在阿曼苏丹卡布斯大学医院(SQUH)接受紧急围产期子宫切除术(EPH)的妇女的危险因素、发病率、适应症、孕产妇和围产期并发症。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,回顾了2007年1月至2016年12月在SQUH进行的所有EPH病例。结果:在9年的研究期间,共有18例EPH;同期的分娩总数为32963次,因此EPH的发生率为每1000次分娩0.55次。在所有EPH病例中,剖宫产子宫切除术13例(72.2%),而产后子宫切除术5例(27.8%)。全子宫切除12例(66.7%),次全子宫切除6例(33.3%)。EPH最常见的危险因素是前置胎盘和植入前剖宫产(CS)(27.6%);其次是既往无前置胎盘的CS(24.1%)。EPH最常见的指征是前置胎盘和植入胎盘(44.4%),以及既往CS(16.7%)。在研究期间,只有一例产妇死亡(5.6%)。没有死产或新生儿早期死亡的病例。膀胱损伤4例(22.2%)。年龄在35-34岁之间且5岁以上的女性EPH发生率最高(50.0%)。结论:为了降低EPH的发生率及其灾难性后果,我们需要在出生前确定高危病例,EPH的潜在病例应在妊娠早期预约,并在妊娠和分娩期间由经验丰富的团队在三级医院进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信