Weak niche partitioning by migrating shorebirds in a single-food-type environment

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ivana Novčič
{"title":"Weak niche partitioning by migrating shorebirds in a single-food-type environment","authors":"Ivana Novčič","doi":"10.1177/1758155919841279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined foraging niche partitioning among coexisting species of shorebirds on a sandy beach dominated by a single food type, Horseshoe Crab (Limulus polyphemus) eggs, where use of foraging microhabitats of limited variety is temporarily restricted due to tidal cycle. The major goal of the study was to examine whether co-occurring species differed in selection of foraging microhabitats and use of feeding techniques. Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres), Red Knot (Calidris canutus), and Sanderling (Calidris alba) foraged significantly more on sand and gravel compared to pools and swash zone, Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) foraged significantly more on sand and gravel compared to swash zone, but not significantly more compared to pools, while differences in use of microhabitats by Dunlin (Calidris alpina), and Short-billed Dowitcher (Limnodromus griseus) were non-significant. Turnstones used digging and turning stones, and pecking significantly more than probing, Semipalmated Sandpipers used pecking significantly more than probing, while all other species used probing significantly more than pecking. Knots and Sanderlings had the highest level of overlap both in use of microhabitats and foraging techniques, while turnstones and dowitchers had the lowest. Ruddy Turnstones were the only birds that used digging and turning stones to obtain food and these two foraging methods seemed to be the most important variables discriminating turnstones from other co-occurring shorebirds. However, despite the slight differences in use of foraging methods and microhabitats by different species, this study documented weak partitioning among shorebirds, particularly between sandpipers and dowitchers. These results indicate that the short-term absence of clear niche partitioning on a local scale may occur in shorebird communities.","PeriodicalId":55408,"journal":{"name":"Avian Biology Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"109 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1758155919841279","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Biology Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758155919841279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study examined foraging niche partitioning among coexisting species of shorebirds on a sandy beach dominated by a single food type, Horseshoe Crab (Limulus polyphemus) eggs, where use of foraging microhabitats of limited variety is temporarily restricted due to tidal cycle. The major goal of the study was to examine whether co-occurring species differed in selection of foraging microhabitats and use of feeding techniques. Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres), Red Knot (Calidris canutus), and Sanderling (Calidris alba) foraged significantly more on sand and gravel compared to pools and swash zone, Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) foraged significantly more on sand and gravel compared to swash zone, but not significantly more compared to pools, while differences in use of microhabitats by Dunlin (Calidris alpina), and Short-billed Dowitcher (Limnodromus griseus) were non-significant. Turnstones used digging and turning stones, and pecking significantly more than probing, Semipalmated Sandpipers used pecking significantly more than probing, while all other species used probing significantly more than pecking. Knots and Sanderlings had the highest level of overlap both in use of microhabitats and foraging techniques, while turnstones and dowitchers had the lowest. Ruddy Turnstones were the only birds that used digging and turning stones to obtain food and these two foraging methods seemed to be the most important variables discriminating turnstones from other co-occurring shorebirds. However, despite the slight differences in use of foraging methods and microhabitats by different species, this study documented weak partitioning among shorebirds, particularly between sandpipers and dowitchers. These results indicate that the short-term absence of clear niche partitioning on a local scale may occur in shorebird communities.
在单一食物类型的环境中,迁徙的滨鸟的生态位划分很弱
本研究考察了在以单一食物类型马蹄蟹卵为主的沙滩上共存的几种滨鸟的觅食生态位分配,由于潮汐循环,有限种类的觅食微栖息地的使用暂时受到限制。本研究的主要目的是研究共生物种在觅食微生境的选择和摄食技术的使用上是否存在差异。红腹沙鹬(Calidris pusilla)在沙地和砾石上的觅食量显著高于池水区和激流区,半蹼沙鹬(Calidris pusilla)在沙地和砾石上的觅食量显著高于激流区,但与池水相比差异不显著,而Dunlin (Calidris alpina)和短嘴鹬(Limnodromus griseus)对微生境的利用差异不显著。土拨石使用挖掘和转动石头,啄的次数明显多于探测,半蹼鹬使用啄的次数明显多于探测,而所有其他物种使用探测的次数明显多于啄的次数。在微生境的使用和觅食技术上,结鱼和三棱鱼的重叠程度最高,而翻石鱼和翻石鱼的重叠程度最低。土拨石是唯一使用挖掘和转动石头来获取食物的鸟类,这两种觅食方式似乎是区分土拨石与其他共存的滨鸟的最重要的变量。然而,尽管不同物种在觅食方式和微栖息地的使用上存在细微差异,但本研究记录了滨鸟之间的弱分区,特别是矶鹞和渡鹬之间。这些结果表明,短期内滨鸟群落可能在局部尺度上缺乏明确的生态位划分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avian Biology Research
Avian Biology Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Avian Biology Research provides a forum for the publication of research in every field of ornithology. It covers all aspects of pure and applied ornithology for wild or captive species as well as research that does not readily fit within the publication objectives of other ornithological journals. By considering a wide range of research fields for publication, Avian Biology Research provides a forum for people working in every field of ornithology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信