SEYYEDHOSSEIN NASR ON ISLAM AND SCIENCE

Rif’at Husnul Ma’afi, Muhammad Fiqih Cholidi
{"title":"SEYYEDHOSSEIN NASR ON ISLAM AND SCIENCE","authors":"Rif’at Husnul Ma’afi, Muhammad Fiqih Cholidi","doi":"10.24235/JY.V5I1.4522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Science and religion are two variables that are warmly discussed by contemporary scientists. John F. Haught for example explains the relationship between religion and science through four phases, namely, conflict, contrast, contact, and confirmation. Between these four phases, John F. Haught himself was in a confirmation position. Likewise Seyyed Hossein Nasr, a Muslim scientist and philosopher, is in the same position as John. This is known from his scientific concept known as Scientia Sacra. This concept is unique from the concept of confirmation or integration of science with religion, especially Islam. Although in the Islamic body there is no conflict between the two, new conflicts arise between the two relations caused by the characteristics of modern science which cause many multidimensional crises. This is what triggers the attitude of Muslims who are indifferent to science. In relation to Islam and science, Nasr has its own model in integrating the two. The model itself departs from the doctrine of cosmology which he considers to be a medicine from the paradigm of modern science: narrow, dark, and divided. The model in integrating science and Islam is to change the paradigm of modern science into the paradigm of Scientia Sacra who sees science as it should. So, science cannot be separated from Islam and must follow the principles in Islam. Keywords: Scientia sacra, integration, absolute reality, multidimensional crisis","PeriodicalId":34854,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Yaqzhan Analisis Filsafat Agama dan Kemanusiaan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Yaqzhan Analisis Filsafat Agama dan Kemanusiaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24235/JY.V5I1.4522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Science and religion are two variables that are warmly discussed by contemporary scientists. John F. Haught for example explains the relationship between religion and science through four phases, namely, conflict, contrast, contact, and confirmation. Between these four phases, John F. Haught himself was in a confirmation position. Likewise Seyyed Hossein Nasr, a Muslim scientist and philosopher, is in the same position as John. This is known from his scientific concept known as Scientia Sacra. This concept is unique from the concept of confirmation or integration of science with religion, especially Islam. Although in the Islamic body there is no conflict between the two, new conflicts arise between the two relations caused by the characteristics of modern science which cause many multidimensional crises. This is what triggers the attitude of Muslims who are indifferent to science. In relation to Islam and science, Nasr has its own model in integrating the two. The model itself departs from the doctrine of cosmology which he considers to be a medicine from the paradigm of modern science: narrow, dark, and divided. The model in integrating science and Islam is to change the paradigm of modern science into the paradigm of Scientia Sacra who sees science as it should. So, science cannot be separated from Islam and must follow the principles in Islam. Keywords: Scientia sacra, integration, absolute reality, multidimensional crisis
赛耶hossein nasr谈伊斯兰教和科学
科学与宗教是当代科学家热议的两个变量。例如,John F. Haught通过四个阶段来解释宗教与科学的关系,即冲突、对比、接触和确认。在这四个阶段之间,约翰·f·霍特本人处于一个确定的位置。同样,穆斯林科学家和哲学家赛义德•侯赛因•纳斯尔(Seyyed Hossein Nasr)的处境与约翰相同。这可以从他的科学概念“神圣科学”中得知。这个概念是独特的,从确认或整合科学与宗教,特别是伊斯兰教的概念。虽然在伊斯兰体系中,这两者之间没有冲突,但由于现代科学的特点,这两种关系之间产生了新的冲突,造成了许多多维度的危机。这就是导致对科学漠不关心的穆斯林态度的原因。关于伊斯兰教和科学,纳斯尔有自己的融合模式。这个模型本身背离了宇宙学的教义,他认为宇宙学是一种医学,背离了现代科学的范式:狭隘、黑暗和分裂。科学与伊斯兰教融合的模式是将现代科学的范式转变为“唯科学论”的Sacra范式。因此,科学不能脱离伊斯兰教,必须遵循伊斯兰教的原则。关键词:神圣科学,整合,绝对现实,多维危机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信