CT radiomics model for differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules

Q4 Medicine
D. Kong, Jian-dong Zhang, W. Shan, S. Duan, Lili Guo
{"title":"CT radiomics model for differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules","authors":"D. Kong, Jian-dong Zhang, W. Shan, S. Duan, Lili Guo","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the value of CT radiomics mode in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical and imaging data of 179 patients with thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology from May 2017 to August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed in the Affiliated Huaian First People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Among the patients, 89 cases were benign nodules and 90 cases were malignant nodules. All patients underwent unenhanced and enhanced CT scan before operation. The stratified random sampling method was used to divide patients into a training group (143 cases) and a testing group (36 cases) according to a ratio of 8∶2. The A.K software was used to extract 378 imaging omics features based on preoperative CT images, and then Spearman correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis were used for feature selection and model construction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to verify the model in the training group and the testing group, and the efficacy of imaging omics features to predict benign and malignant thyroid nodules was evaluated. \n \n \nResults \nAfter feature screening, 16 radiomics features were used to construct an identification model between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. In the training group, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.97], the sensitivity and specificity were 88.7%, 82.0%, and the diagnostic accuracy of the model was 91.1%. In the testing group, AUC was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.81-0.98), sensitivity and specificity were 88.5%, 84.6%, and the diagnostic accuracy of the model was 88.2%. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe CT radiomics mode has a good diagnostic performance in the identification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. \n \n \nKey words: \nTomography, X-Ray computed; Thyroid nodule; Diagnosis, differential; Radiomics","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of CT radiomics mode in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods The clinical and imaging data of 179 patients with thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology from May 2017 to August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed in the Affiliated Huaian First People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Among the patients, 89 cases were benign nodules and 90 cases were malignant nodules. All patients underwent unenhanced and enhanced CT scan before operation. The stratified random sampling method was used to divide patients into a training group (143 cases) and a testing group (36 cases) according to a ratio of 8∶2. The A.K software was used to extract 378 imaging omics features based on preoperative CT images, and then Spearman correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis were used for feature selection and model construction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to verify the model in the training group and the testing group, and the efficacy of imaging omics features to predict benign and malignant thyroid nodules was evaluated. Results After feature screening, 16 radiomics features were used to construct an identification model between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. In the training group, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.97], the sensitivity and specificity were 88.7%, 82.0%, and the diagnostic accuracy of the model was 91.1%. In the testing group, AUC was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.81-0.98), sensitivity and specificity were 88.5%, 84.6%, and the diagnostic accuracy of the model was 88.2%. Conclusion The CT radiomics mode has a good diagnostic performance in the identification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Key words: Tomography, X-Ray computed; Thyroid nodule; Diagnosis, differential; Radiomics
鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的CT放射组学模型
目的探讨CT放射组学模式在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的价值。方法回顾性分析2017年5月至2018年8月在南京医科大学附属淮安第一人民医院经病理证实的179例甲状腺结节患者的临床和影像学资料。其中良性结节89例,恶性结节90例。所有患者术前均进行了CT平扫和增强扫描。采用分层随机抽样方法,将患者按8∶2的比例分为训练组(143例)和试验组(36例)。使用A.K软件基于术前CT图像提取378个成像组学特征,然后使用Spearman相关分析和最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归分析进行特征选择和模型构建。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线用于验证训练组和测试组的模型,并评估成像组学特征预测甲状腺良恶性结节的疗效。结果经过特征筛选,利用16个放射组学特征构建了甲状腺良恶性结节的鉴别模型。训练组的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.92[95%置信区间(CI):0.88-0.97],敏感性和特异性分别为88.7%、82.0%,模型诊断准确率为91.1%。测试组的AUC为0.90(95%置信区间:0.81-0.98),敏感性和特异度分别为88.5%、84.6%,结论CT放射组学模式对甲状腺良恶性结节具有良好的诊断性能。关键词:体层摄影、X射线计算机;甲状腺结节;诊断,鉴别;放射组学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信