Teaching Forgetfulness: How a Greek Statue Has Led Us Back into the Cave

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael Arvanitopoulos
{"title":"Teaching Forgetfulness: How a Greek Statue Has Led Us Back into the Cave","authors":"Michael Arvanitopoulos","doi":"10.5406/jaesteduc.54.3.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Teachers are well aware of the deterioration that some half a century of market ideology has inflicted on both the subject matter and the method of teaching art. The commodification of education has been fought on different fronts, yet without the recognition that the remedies themselves may promulgate and recirculate the existential threat they try to remove from our schools. That the battle is already lost at a level one order more complex than generally thought is showcased by examining here how we teach a particular work, a specimen of Greek statuary. Heidegger claimed that there must be some art through which all art is intelligible and pointed to the Greek statue. The return to neoclassicism and the Romantics, from where aesthetics draws its self-proclaimed potentiality to counter neoliberalism, is somehow in tune with Heidegger’s dictum. However, both the aesthetic approach and Heidegger, who fought aestheticism, are shown here to have failed before the higher demand that the statue exacts on our epistemology both on its conclusions and on its method. We have grappled with the Greek statue since the dawn of Western thought, and we now think we know what this thing is, yet all we teach is our ignorance compiled with the ignorance of our ignorance. The projections of this elucidation suggest that the alienation that in our day poses as education will not end, unless we gain access to that art which determines both what art is and how we should teach it.","PeriodicalId":45866,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","volume":"54 1","pages":"70 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.3.0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Teachers are well aware of the deterioration that some half a century of market ideology has inflicted on both the subject matter and the method of teaching art. The commodification of education has been fought on different fronts, yet without the recognition that the remedies themselves may promulgate and recirculate the existential threat they try to remove from our schools. That the battle is already lost at a level one order more complex than generally thought is showcased by examining here how we teach a particular work, a specimen of Greek statuary. Heidegger claimed that there must be some art through which all art is intelligible and pointed to the Greek statue. The return to neoclassicism and the Romantics, from where aesthetics draws its self-proclaimed potentiality to counter neoliberalism, is somehow in tune with Heidegger’s dictum. However, both the aesthetic approach and Heidegger, who fought aestheticism, are shown here to have failed before the higher demand that the statue exacts on our epistemology both on its conclusions and on its method. We have grappled with the Greek statue since the dawn of Western thought, and we now think we know what this thing is, yet all we teach is our ignorance compiled with the ignorance of our ignorance. The projections of this elucidation suggest that the alienation that in our day poses as education will not end, unless we gain access to that art which determines both what art is and how we should teach it.
教导遗忘:一尊希腊雕像如何带领我们回到洞穴
摘要:教师们清楚地意识到,半个世纪以来的市场意识形态对艺术教学的主题和方法造成了恶化。教育的商品化在不同的战线上进行了斗争,但他们没有意识到,补救措施本身可能会传播和重新传播他们试图从我们学校消除的生存威胁。通过研究我们如何教授一件特定的作品,一件希腊雕像标本,可以看出这场战斗已经在一个比一般想象的更复杂的层次上失败了。海德格尔声称,必须有某种艺术,通过它所有的艺术都是可理解的,并指向希腊雕像。回到新古典主义和浪漫主义,美学从中获得了对抗新自由主义的自称潜力,这在某种程度上符合海德格尔的格言。然而,在雕像对我们的认识论提出更高的要求之前,无论是在结论上还是在方法上,美学方法还是与唯美主义作斗争的海德格尔都失败了。自西方思想出现以来,我们一直在与希腊雕像作斗争,现在我们认为我们知道这是什么,但我们所教的只是我们的无知与我们的无知交织在一起。这一阐释的预测表明,在我们这个时代,作为教育的异化不会结束,除非我们能够接触到决定艺术是什么以及我们应该如何教授它的艺术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aesthetic Education (JAE) is a highly respected interdisciplinary journal that focuses on clarifying the issues of aesthetic education understood in its most extensive meaning. The journal thus welcomes articles on philosophical aesthetics and education, to problem areas in education critical to arts and humanities at all institutional levels; to an understanding of the aesthetic import of the new communications media and environmental aesthetics; and to an understanding of the aesthetic character of humanistic disciplines. The journal is a valuable resource not only to educators, but also to philosophers, art critics and art historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信