La Contribución Del Opanal Al Desarme Nuclear En Latinoamérica: Un Análisis De La Efectividad Del Régimen De Tlatelolco Y de la Gobernanza Regional sobre la no Proliferación Nuclear
{"title":"La Contribución Del Opanal Al Desarme Nuclear En Latinoamérica: Un Análisis De La Efectividad Del Régimen De Tlatelolco Y de la Gobernanza Regional sobre la no Proliferación Nuclear","authors":"Elias David Morales Martinez","doi":"10.21544/1809-3191.v25n2.p292-314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESUMEN En el ano 2017 se completaron 50 anos del Tratado de Tlatelolco que establecio la primera Zona Libre de Armas Nucleares del mundo al proscribir este armamento en America Latina y el Caribe. Como instrumento tecnico y politico para verificar la implementacion de los acuerdos fue creado el Organismo para la Proscripcion de Armas Nucleares – OPANAL. Sin embargo, muchas de las atribuciones fueron transferidas a la Agencia Internacional de Energia Atomica – AIEA. En el presente trabajo se analiza la contribucion del OPANAL al desarme nuclear, teniendo en cuenta sus aciertos y fragilidades. Este analisis utilizara los postulados teoricos de Bobbio (2003) sobre el Pacifismo Activo Instrumental y de Axerold e Keohone (1986) las dimensiones de la efectividad de regimenes internacionales. ABSTRACT 50 years of the Treaty of Tlatelolco were completed in 2017, which established the first Nuclear Weapons Free Zone of the world not allowing this armament in Latin America and the Caribbean. As a technical and political instrument to verify the implementation of the agreements was created the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons - OPANAL. However, many of the responsabilities were transferred to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This paper analyzes the contribution of OPANAL to nuclear disarmament, taking into account its successes and weaknesses. This analysis will use the theoretical postulates of Bobbio (2003) on the Instrumental Active Pacifism and Axerold and Keohone (1986) about the dimensions of the effectiveness of international regimes.","PeriodicalId":52743,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21544/1809-3191.v25n2.p292-314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
RESUMEN En el ano 2017 se completaron 50 anos del Tratado de Tlatelolco que establecio la primera Zona Libre de Armas Nucleares del mundo al proscribir este armamento en America Latina y el Caribe. Como instrumento tecnico y politico para verificar la implementacion de los acuerdos fue creado el Organismo para la Proscripcion de Armas Nucleares – OPANAL. Sin embargo, muchas de las atribuciones fueron transferidas a la Agencia Internacional de Energia Atomica – AIEA. En el presente trabajo se analiza la contribucion del OPANAL al desarme nuclear, teniendo en cuenta sus aciertos y fragilidades. Este analisis utilizara los postulados teoricos de Bobbio (2003) sobre el Pacifismo Activo Instrumental y de Axerold e Keohone (1986) las dimensiones de la efectividad de regimenes internacionales. ABSTRACT 50 years of the Treaty of Tlatelolco were completed in 2017, which established the first Nuclear Weapons Free Zone of the world not allowing this armament in Latin America and the Caribbean. As a technical and political instrument to verify the implementation of the agreements was created the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons - OPANAL. However, many of the responsabilities were transferred to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This paper analyzes the contribution of OPANAL to nuclear disarmament, taking into account its successes and weaknesses. This analysis will use the theoretical postulates of Bobbio (2003) on the Instrumental Active Pacifism and Axerold and Keohone (1986) about the dimensions of the effectiveness of international regimes.