To Be an Autoethnographer or Not to Be—That Is the Question

Q3 Social Sciences

Qualitative Sociology Review Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.18778/1733-8077.18.4.10

L. Marciniak

引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is the most personal article I have ever written, revealing my fears, hesitations, reflections, and decisions. I am still striving to write a scientific and academic paper, still looking for that academic framework that would allow this article to be recognized as a scientific text, with the reflection on that internal pressure and need to make it scientific. This is an article about the process of becoming an autoethnographer, creating a tool, shaping identity and research strategy, and becoming one.

查看原文本刊更多论文

做一名民族志学家还是不做——这就是问题所在

这是我写过的最私人的文章，揭示了我的恐惧、犹豫、反思和决定。我仍然在努力写一篇科学和学术的论文，仍然在寻找一个学术框架，让这篇文章被认为是一篇科学的文本，反思这种内在的压力和使它科学的需要。这是一篇关于成为一名民族志学家的过程的文章，创造一种工具，塑造身份和研究策略，然后成为一名民族志学家。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Qualitative Sociology Review Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： For a long time, we have observed an increased interest in qualitative sociology, and the use of an interpretive frame to understand human actions, social processes, meanings and definitions, and new social theory generally. In order to enable a free flow of information and to integrate the community of qualitative sociologists, we have decided to create an open-access, international scientific journal. Qualitative Sociology Review publishes empirical, theoretical and methodological articles applicable to all fields and specializations within sociology.