Alternate tillage and crop-establishment techniques in rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) system for increased system productivity and profitability in eastern sub-Himalayan plains of India

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
{"title":"Alternate tillage and crop-establishment techniques in rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) system for increased system productivity and profitability in eastern sub-Himalayan plains of India","authors":"","doi":"10.59797/ija.v68i2.346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was undertaken from the rainy season 2015 to winter season 2016–17 at the Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal. The aim of the study was to arrive at optimal tillage requirement in rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system to economize on energy, labour and time, and to work out the production economics of rice–wheat system as a whole under various crop-establishment techniques. Unpuddled rice (UPTR) followed by zero tillage (ZT) wheat recorded superior yield performances to conventional tillage-based systems over the years. Fuel and labour requirement was reduced by 86.93 and 51.85%, 66.28 and 45.67% and 77.84 and 48.97% under rice (direct seeding)–wheat (surface seeding), rice (UPTR)–wheat (ZT) and rice (bed planting)–wheat (bed planting), respectively. Rice (UPTR)–wheat (ZT) also recorded the maximum energy efficiency (12.15) and energy productivity (0.94 kg/MJ) with lowest specific energy (31.67) which was reflective of the better system output. Despite lesser cost of cultivation under rice (direct seeding)–wheat (surface seeding) system, the monetary returns as well as benefit: cost ratio were much lesser under this system due to poor crop stand owing to high pre-monsoon and monsoon shower. The maximum net returns (`33,888 and `42,835/ha during 2015–16 and 2016–17 respectively) and benefit: cost ratio (1.68 and 1.85 during 2015–16 and 2016–17 respectively) under rice (UPTR)–wheat (ZT) system reflected its superiority to the other establishment techniques.","PeriodicalId":35528,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v68i2.346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was undertaken from the rainy season 2015 to winter season 2016–17 at the Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal. The aim of the study was to arrive at optimal tillage requirement in rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system to economize on energy, labour and time, and to work out the production economics of rice–wheat system as a whole under various crop-establishment techniques. Unpuddled rice (UPTR) followed by zero tillage (ZT) wheat recorded superior yield performances to conventional tillage-based systems over the years. Fuel and labour requirement was reduced by 86.93 and 51.85%, 66.28 and 45.67% and 77.84 and 48.97% under rice (direct seeding)–wheat (surface seeding), rice (UPTR)–wheat (ZT) and rice (bed planting)–wheat (bed planting), respectively. Rice (UPTR)–wheat (ZT) also recorded the maximum energy efficiency (12.15) and energy productivity (0.94 kg/MJ) with lowest specific energy (31.67) which was reflective of the better system output. Despite lesser cost of cultivation under rice (direct seeding)–wheat (surface seeding) system, the monetary returns as well as benefit: cost ratio were much lesser under this system due to poor crop stand owing to high pre-monsoon and monsoon shower. The maximum net returns (`33,888 and `42,835/ha during 2015–16 and 2016–17 respectively) and benefit: cost ratio (1.68 and 1.85 during 2015–16 and 2016–17 respectively) under rice (UPTR)–wheat (ZT) system reflected its superiority to the other establishment techniques.
印度亚喜马拉雅山脉东部平原水稻(Oryza sativa)-小麦(Triticum aestivum)系统的交替耕作和作物建立技术,以提高系统生产力和盈利能力
该研究于2015年雨季至2016-17年冬季在西孟加拉邦旁迪巴里的Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya进行。本研究的目的是为了求得稻-麦系统在节能、省力、省时方面的最优耕作需要量,并计算出不同建种技术下稻-麦系统整体的生产经济性。多年来,免耕水稻(UPTR)和免耕小麦(ZT)的产量表现优于传统的耕作制度。稻(直播)-小麦(地表播种)、稻(UPTR) -小麦(ZT)和稻(床播)-小麦(床播)分别减少86.93%和51.85%、66.28%和45.67%和77.84%和48.97%的燃料和劳动力需求。水稻(UPTR) -小麦(ZT)的能量效率最高(12.15),能量生产力最高(0.94 kg/MJ),比能最低(31.67),反映了较好的系统产量。尽管水稻(直接播种)-小麦(地面播种)系统的种植成本较低,但由于季风前和季风阵雨较多,作物生长状况不佳,因此该系统的经济回报和效益成本比要低得多。水稻(UPTR) -小麦(ZT)体系的最大净收益(2015-16年和2016-17年分别为33,888和42,835/公顷)和效益成本比(2015-16年和2016-17年分别为1.68和1.85)反映了其优于其他种植技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Agronomy
Indian Journal of Agronomy Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Agronomy welcomes concise articles presenting original research data based on field experiments on all aspects of agronomy in different crops and related cropping systems. • The journal publishes only full length comprehensive articles based on new approaches/findings in English only. • Review articles are also considered but these are normally solicited by Editorial Board. However, the authors who wish to contribute a review on their own based on their standing in the relevant field may contact the Secretary or Chief Editor with a broad outline before submitting the manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信