INBETWEEN HETEROTOPIA AND SIMULACRUM: VERNACULAR LANGUAGE OF COURTYARDS IN BANGLADESH’S ARCHITECTURE

Q1 Engineering
A. Ahmed
{"title":"INBETWEEN HETEROTOPIA AND SIMULACRUM: VERNACULAR LANGUAGE OF COURTYARDS IN BANGLADESH’S ARCHITECTURE","authors":"A. Ahmed","doi":"10.23968/2500-0055-2019-4-4-03-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The courtyard was perceived by generations just like a religious act in Bengal delta. Even the community cohesion of the courtyard space was repeated and maintained in the township context, which neither belongs to agricultural nor working class but rather to educated elites with western zest. How has this unique feature been evolving and why is the appeal still the same today? Is the courtyard’s permeability just the ‘in-between space’ or was it derived from the aspiration of philosophical legacy? Methods: The study uses a twofold method derived from solid-void relationships. Firstly, eastern and western philosophical discourses were compared, and the extensive literature review is presented. Secondly, historical evidence and logics behind the courtyard’s position from micro to macro scale, from household to city formation is presented and analyzed in the philosophical context. Results and discussion: From a very complex lattice and layers related to architectural philosophy, two important figures of western world, Baudrillard and Foucault’s ideas proved crucial to comprehend how an image of the courtyard remained constant and how it is empowered as a core space from the socio-cultural and functional views. The result affiliated western objectives and eastern subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":52295,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2019-4-4-03-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The courtyard was perceived by generations just like a religious act in Bengal delta. Even the community cohesion of the courtyard space was repeated and maintained in the township context, which neither belongs to agricultural nor working class but rather to educated elites with western zest. How has this unique feature been evolving and why is the appeal still the same today? Is the courtyard’s permeability just the ‘in-between space’ or was it derived from the aspiration of philosophical legacy? Methods: The study uses a twofold method derived from solid-void relationships. Firstly, eastern and western philosophical discourses were compared, and the extensive literature review is presented. Secondly, historical evidence and logics behind the courtyard’s position from micro to macro scale, from household to city formation is presented and analyzed in the philosophical context. Results and discussion: From a very complex lattice and layers related to architectural philosophy, two important figures of western world, Baudrillard and Foucault’s ideas proved crucial to comprehend how an image of the courtyard remained constant and how it is empowered as a core space from the socio-cultural and functional views. The result affiliated western objectives and eastern subjectivity.
异托邦与拟像之间&孟加拉国建筑中庭院的乡土语言
引言:几代人认为这个庭院就像孟加拉三角洲的一种宗教活动。甚至庭院空间的社区凝聚力也在乡镇背景下得到了重复和保持,乡镇背景既不属于农业阶级,也不属于工人阶级,而是具有西方热情的受过教育的精英。这种独特的功能是如何演变的,为什么今天的吸引力仍然不变?庭院的渗透性只是“中间空间”,还是源于对哲学遗产的渴望?方法:本研究采用了从固体-孔隙关系中导出的双重方法。首先,对东西方哲学话语进行了比较,并进行了广泛的文献综述。其次,从微观到宏观,从家庭到城市形成,在哲学语境中呈现和分析了庭院地位背后的历史证据和逻辑。结果和讨论:从一个与建筑哲学相关的非常复杂的格子和层次来看,西方世界的两位重要人物,鲍德里亚和福柯的思想对于理解庭院的形象如何保持不变以及如何从社会文化和功能的角度赋予它作为核心空间的权力至关重要。其结果是西方的目标与东方的主体性相联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Architecture and Engineering
Architecture and Engineering Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信