The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights

Victor Manuel Solís Buitrón
{"title":"The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights","authors":"Victor Manuel Solís Buitrón","doi":"10.18800/iusetveritas.202002.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Last August of this year, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, through the Law School, by initiative of the College of Professors of Criminal Law, in response to the suspension of academic activities, as a result of the pandemic that afflicts the world arising from the SARS-Cov2 virus, taking advantage of digital platforms available to people at this time as a tool to use to communicate at a distance, organized the First International Virtual Congress of Criminal Law. In this event, more than 130 academics from different Latin American Universities participated as speakers, who presented on topics of the criminal legal reality, both substantive and adjective, in the panels that were organized by themes that addressed different concepts in these specialties. The Congress was embellished by Magisterial Conferences issued by Masters Emeritus and Deans of the Faculty of Law of the UNAM and other law schools of invited countries. The importance of the Congress surprised the Academic Forum, almost twenty thousand people registered and approximately two million of them accessed the event that was transmitted and broadcast on social networks through the Facebook platform “Live streaming”. From the approaches that were most emphasized in the presentations, the concern of the present article is born. Specifically, it highlights concerns about exercise, it highlights the concern about the arbitrary exercise of criminal law due to its punitive nature and the importance of limiting the excess in its application, respecting in general the human rights of individuals and, in particular, those recognized for the parties in the procedural rules, this in equity with the Fundamental Principles of the Prosecution Systems in the accusatory model, already adopted in practically all democratic countries in Latin America. This highlights the need for a new definition of preventive prison, conceived now as a precautionary measure and its intimate relation with the principle of the “Presumption of Innocence”, in whose application there must be absolute communion, a necessary condition in order to have a profound and definitive vision in the protection of Human rights.","PeriodicalId":31485,"journal":{"name":"Ius Et Veritas","volume":"1 1","pages":"276-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Et Veritas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202002.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Last August of this year, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, through the Law School, by initiative of the College of Professors of Criminal Law, in response to the suspension of academic activities, as a result of the pandemic that afflicts the world arising from the SARS-Cov2 virus, taking advantage of digital platforms available to people at this time as a tool to use to communicate at a distance, organized the First International Virtual Congress of Criminal Law. In this event, more than 130 academics from different Latin American Universities participated as speakers, who presented on topics of the criminal legal reality, both substantive and adjective, in the panels that were organized by themes that addressed different concepts in these specialties. The Congress was embellished by Magisterial Conferences issued by Masters Emeritus and Deans of the Faculty of Law of the UNAM and other law schools of invited countries. The importance of the Congress surprised the Academic Forum, almost twenty thousand people registered and approximately two million of them accessed the event that was transmitted and broadcast on social networks through the Facebook platform “Live streaming”. From the approaches that were most emphasized in the presentations, the concern of the present article is born. Specifically, it highlights concerns about exercise, it highlights the concern about the arbitrary exercise of criminal law due to its punitive nature and the importance of limiting the excess in its application, respecting in general the human rights of individuals and, in particular, those recognized for the parties in the procedural rules, this in equity with the Fundamental Principles of the Prosecution Systems in the accusatory model, already adopted in practically all democratic countries in Latin America. This highlights the need for a new definition of preventive prison, conceived now as a precautionary measure and its intimate relation with the principle of the “Presumption of Innocence”, in whose application there must be absolute communion, a necessary condition in order to have a profound and definitive vision in the protection of Human rights.
控诉制度的对立。关于规范非正式和合理的预防性监狱以实现数字正义并根据人权的建议
今年8月,墨西哥国立自治大学通过法学院,在刑法教授学院的倡议下,为应对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型在世界范围内肆虐的疫情导致的学术活动暂停,利用当时人们可以使用的数字平台作为远程通信的工具,组织了第一届国际刑法虚拟大会。在这次活动中,来自拉丁美洲不同大学的130多名学者作为发言人参加了小组讨论会,他们就刑事法律现实的实质性和形容性主题进行了发言,小组讨论会的主题涉及这些专业中的不同概念。联合国大学法学院名誉硕士和院长以及受邀国家的其他法学院举行的法官会议为大会增色不少。大会的重要性令学术论坛感到惊讶,近2万人注册,其中约200万人访问了通过Facebook平台“直播”在社交网络上传播和广播的活动。从专题介绍中最为强调的方法来看,本条的关切就产生了。具体而言,它强调了对行使的关切,强调了对任意行使刑法的关切,因为刑法具有惩罚性,而且必须限制其过度适用,普遍尊重个人人权,特别是程序规则中承认的当事人人权,这与拉丁美洲几乎所有民主国家都已采用的起诉模式中的起诉制度基本原则是一致的。这突出表明,有必要对预防性监狱下一个新的定义,现在将其视为一种预防措施,并与“推定无罪”原则密切相关,在适用该原则时,必须有绝对的交流,这是在保护人权方面有一个深刻而明确的愿景的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书