Development of a Scale for Quantitative Evaluation of Exercise Instructors for Older People

Q4 Health Professions
Jeeyoung Hong, Haeryun Kim, H. Kong
{"title":"Development of a Scale for Quantitative Evaluation of Exercise Instructors for Older People","authors":"Jeeyoung Hong, Haeryun Kim, H. Kong","doi":"10.15857/ksep.2022.00507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability.METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program.RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety.CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.","PeriodicalId":36291,"journal":{"name":"Exercise Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15857/ksep.2022.00507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability.METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program.RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety.CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.
老年人运动指导员定量评价量表的研制
目的:本研究的目的是编制一份定量评价运动指导员教学能力的量表,并对其效度和信度进行验证。方法:以331名体育学院在校生为研究对象。这项调查是使用谷歌表格进行的。问卷共36个问题,其中7个是关于专业精神的问题;八、情感沟通能力;九是忠诚;12个是关于安全的。采用5分李克特量表。进行因子分析,计算Cronbach’s alpha系数对研究工具进行效度和信度分析;并进行相关分析和多元回归分析。所有数据采用STATA 17.0统计程序进行分析。结果:在本研究编制的老年人运动指导员评价问卷中,各因子的KMO值均为0.8(0.88-0.93),对专业性、情感沟通能力、保真度、安全性等因子具有一定的效度。Cronbach α系数为0.9031,信度较高。各因素之间存在很强的相关性,通过回归分析,年龄(。1874, p=.027),专业性(。8049, p=.000),保真度(。6009年,p =组织)。评价问卷的充分性(1.8606,p=.000)对安全性有统计学意义。结论:本问卷可作为提高老年人运动指导员素质的工具,并为未来的老年人运动指导员选择合适的教学方法提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Exercise Science
Exercise Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信