{"title":"João do Rio in Portugal: Counterfeit Currency and Luso-Brazilian Desleixo","authors":"R. Newcomb","doi":"10.21471/JLS.V3I2.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I examine an anecdote concerning a counterfeit coin included in João do Rio’s Portugal d’agora (1911). After contextualizing Rio’s interest in Portugal, I argue that the anecdote reveals a latent anxiety about the security of money as a reliable signifier, and about the integrity of the Portuguese monetary system. I contend that this anxiety constitutes one side—the obverse, in numismatic terms—of Rio’s portrait of Portugal during the first years of the 20th century. The \"reverse\" consists of his descriptions of what we, following Sérgio Buarque de Holanda in Raízes do Brasil (1936), might term Luso-Brazilian desleixo. In my conclusion, I connect Rio’s two-sided view of Portugal with his later positions, as articulated in the journal Atlântida (1915-20), which he co-edited with João de Barros.","PeriodicalId":52257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lusophone Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lusophone Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21471/JLS.V3I2.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, I examine an anecdote concerning a counterfeit coin included in João do Rio’s Portugal d’agora (1911). After contextualizing Rio’s interest in Portugal, I argue that the anecdote reveals a latent anxiety about the security of money as a reliable signifier, and about the integrity of the Portuguese monetary system. I contend that this anxiety constitutes one side—the obverse, in numismatic terms—of Rio’s portrait of Portugal during the first years of the 20th century. The "reverse" consists of his descriptions of what we, following Sérgio Buarque de Holanda in Raízes do Brasil (1936), might term Luso-Brazilian desleixo. In my conclusion, I connect Rio’s two-sided view of Portugal with his later positions, as articulated in the journal Atlântida (1915-20), which he co-edited with João de Barros.
在这篇文章中,我研究了一个轶事关于伪造硬币包括在jo do b里约热内卢的葡萄牙d 'agora(1911)。在将b里约热内卢对葡萄牙的兴趣置于背景之后,我认为,这件轶事揭示了一种潜在的焦虑,即对货币作为一种可靠的能指的安全性,以及对葡萄牙货币体系完整性的担忧。我认为,这种焦虑构成了20世纪初b里约热内卢描绘葡萄牙的一面——用货币术语来说,是正面的一面。“反向”包括他对我们的描述,按照ssamrgio Buarque de Holanda在Raízes do Brasil(1936)中的说法,可能会称之为葡-巴西desleixo。在我的结论中,我将b里约热内卢对葡萄牙的两面派观点与他后来的立场联系起来,正如他与jo o de Barros合编的《atlntida》(1915- 1920)杂志所阐述的那样。