Outcome of conservative and pharmacological treatment of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants less than 34 weeks

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
T. Alsafadi
{"title":"Outcome of conservative and pharmacological treatment of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants less than 34 weeks","authors":"T. Alsafadi","doi":"10.4103/jcn.jcn_6_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Preterm infants frequently have hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Persistent ductal shunting may result in pulmonary hyper circulation, increasing the risk of mortality and morbidity. The effectiveness of active management, as well as the timing and modality of PDA treatment, is still debatable. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in mortality and morbidity between conservative and pharmacological treatment of clinically significant PDA in preterm infants at <34 weeks. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Comprised of two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Materials and Methods: NICUs medical records from 2017 to 2020. Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1059 medical records were screened for the study, with 106 preterm (PT) infants included. The mean gestational age was 29.2 ± 3.2 weeks, the mean birth weight (BW) was 1267 ± 485 g, and the mean length of stay in the hospital was 30 ± 20 days. Twenty patients (18.8%) received paracetamol, six patients (5.6%) received ibuprofen, one patient (0.9%) received surgical ligation, and one patient (0.9%) received indomethacin. Five patients (4.7%) received multiple courses of PDA medication. Nineteen patients (17.9%) received diuretics. [Table 1] also contains additional data characteristics. After adjusting the confounding variables, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (odds ratio [OR]: 5 P: 0.04) and BW were found to increase mortality (OR: 0.87 P: 0.034). Conservative treatment (OR: 1.4, P = 0.38), paracetamol (OR: 0.87, P = 0.22), and ibuprofen (OR 1.2, P = 0.12) had no effect on mortality. None of the treatment modalities (conservative, paracetamol, or ibuprofen) has a significant effect on morbidities (IVH, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, late onset sepsis, pulmonary hemorrhage, or necrotizing enterocolitis). Conclusion: In PT 34 weeks, there was no difference in mortality or morbidity between conservative and pharmacological treatment of hemodynamically significant PDA.","PeriodicalId":45332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","volume":"11 1","pages":"19 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_6_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants frequently have hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Persistent ductal shunting may result in pulmonary hyper circulation, increasing the risk of mortality and morbidity. The effectiveness of active management, as well as the timing and modality of PDA treatment, is still debatable. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in mortality and morbidity between conservative and pharmacological treatment of clinically significant PDA in preterm infants at <34 weeks. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Comprised of two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Materials and Methods: NICUs medical records from 2017 to 2020. Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1059 medical records were screened for the study, with 106 preterm (PT) infants included. The mean gestational age was 29.2 ± 3.2 weeks, the mean birth weight (BW) was 1267 ± 485 g, and the mean length of stay in the hospital was 30 ± 20 days. Twenty patients (18.8%) received paracetamol, six patients (5.6%) received ibuprofen, one patient (0.9%) received surgical ligation, and one patient (0.9%) received indomethacin. Five patients (4.7%) received multiple courses of PDA medication. Nineteen patients (17.9%) received diuretics. [Table 1] also contains additional data characteristics. After adjusting the confounding variables, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (odds ratio [OR]: 5 P: 0.04) and BW were found to increase mortality (OR: 0.87 P: 0.034). Conservative treatment (OR: 1.4, P = 0.38), paracetamol (OR: 0.87, P = 0.22), and ibuprofen (OR 1.2, P = 0.12) had no effect on mortality. None of the treatment modalities (conservative, paracetamol, or ibuprofen) has a significant effect on morbidities (IVH, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, late onset sepsis, pulmonary hemorrhage, or necrotizing enterocolitis). Conclusion: In PT 34 weeks, there was no difference in mortality or morbidity between conservative and pharmacological treatment of hemodynamically significant PDA.
小于34周早产儿血流动力学显著性动脉导管未闭的保守治疗和药物治疗的结果
背景:早产儿经常有血流动力学显著的动脉导管未闭(PDA)。持续的导管分流可导致肺动脉过度循环,增加死亡率和发病率的风险。积极管理的有效性,以及PDA治疗的时间和方式,仍然存在争议。目的:本研究的目的是确定保守治疗与药物治疗在<34周有临床意义的PDA的早产儿的死亡率和发病率是否有差异。设计:回顾性研究。环境:由两个新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)组成。材料与方法:2017 - 2020年新生儿重症监护病房病历。统计分析:逻辑回归分析。结果:本研究共筛选了1059份医疗记录,其中包括106例早产儿。平均胎龄29.2±3.2周,平均出生体重(BW) 1267±485 g,平均住院时间30±20天。对乙酰氨基酚20例(18.8%),布洛芬6例(5.6%),手术结扎1例(0.9%),吲哚美辛1例(0.9%)。5例患者(4.7%)接受了多个疗程的PDA治疗。19例患者(17.9%)使用利尿剂。[表1]还包含其他数据特征。调整混杂变量后,发现脑室内出血(IVH)(比值比[OR]: 5 P: 0.04)和体重增加了死亡率(OR: 0.87 P: 0.034)。保守治疗(OR: 1.4, P = 0.38)、扑热息痛(OR: 0.87, P = 0.22)和布洛芬(OR: 1.2, P = 0.12)对死亡率没有影响。没有一种治疗方式(保守、扑热息痛或布洛芬)对发病率(IVH、支气管肺发育不良、早产儿视网膜病变、晚发性败血症、肺出血或坏死性小肠结肠炎)有显著影响。结论:在PT 34周时,保守治疗与药物治疗的死亡率和发病率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The JCN publishes original articles, clinical reviews and research reports which encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信