Knowledge “hiding and seeking” during the pandemic: who really wins in the new normal?

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Kim-Lim Tan, I. S. Hii, Kevin Cheong
{"title":"Knowledge “hiding and seeking” during the pandemic: who really wins in the new normal?","authors":"Kim-Lim Tan, I. S. Hii, Kevin Cheong","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-04-2022-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe recent COVID-19 pandemic caused a severe economic downturn. Employees working in these organisations face employment uncertainty. The pandemic disrupted their daily routines, and it added a layer of complexity to the already resource-constrained environment. During these times, employees would conserve their resources to maintain competitiveness, one of which is knowledge hiding. While economic activities are resuming, the appearance of new variants could mean the transition towards endemicity could be put on hold. Hence, there is a need to rethink the behaviour of employees as they would have elevated levels of anxiety towards resuming daily work activities. Therefore, this study aims to address the question of understanding employees’ perspectives toward knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDrawing on the conservation of resources theory, social learning theory and the social exchange theory (SET), a conceptual framework involving ethical leadership was developed to examine if knowledge hiding or knowledge sharing behaviour is a resource for employees during these times. The partial least squares method of structural equation modelling was used to analyse results from 271 white-collar employees from Singapore.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that ethical leadership encourages knowledge sharing but does not reduce knowledge hiding. At the same time, knowledge hiding, not knowledge sharing, improves one’s perception of work performance. Additionally, psychological safety is the key construct that reduces knowledge hiding and encourages sharing behaviour.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOverall, this study extends the theories, demonstrating that, first and foremost, knowledge hiding is a form of resource that provides employees with an added advantage in work performance during the endemic. At the same time, we provide a new perspective that ethical leaders’ demonstration of integrity, honesty and altruism alone is insufficient to encourage knowledge sharing or reduce knowledge hiding. It must lead to a psychologically safe environment.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-04-2022-0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose The recent COVID-19 pandemic caused a severe economic downturn. Employees working in these organisations face employment uncertainty. The pandemic disrupted their daily routines, and it added a layer of complexity to the already resource-constrained environment. During these times, employees would conserve their resources to maintain competitiveness, one of which is knowledge hiding. While economic activities are resuming, the appearance of new variants could mean the transition towards endemicity could be put on hold. Hence, there is a need to rethink the behaviour of employees as they would have elevated levels of anxiety towards resuming daily work activities. Therefore, this study aims to address the question of understanding employees’ perspectives toward knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, social learning theory and the social exchange theory (SET), a conceptual framework involving ethical leadership was developed to examine if knowledge hiding or knowledge sharing behaviour is a resource for employees during these times. The partial least squares method of structural equation modelling was used to analyse results from 271 white-collar employees from Singapore. Findings The results show that ethical leadership encourages knowledge sharing but does not reduce knowledge hiding. At the same time, knowledge hiding, not knowledge sharing, improves one’s perception of work performance. Additionally, psychological safety is the key construct that reduces knowledge hiding and encourages sharing behaviour. Originality/value Overall, this study extends the theories, demonstrating that, first and foremost, knowledge hiding is a form of resource that provides employees with an added advantage in work performance during the endemic. At the same time, we provide a new perspective that ethical leaders’ demonstration of integrity, honesty and altruism alone is insufficient to encourage knowledge sharing or reduce knowledge hiding. It must lead to a psychologically safe environment.
大流行期间的知识“捉迷藏”:新常态下谁才是真正的赢家?
近期新冠肺炎疫情导致经济严重下滑。在这些组织工作的员工面临就业不确定性。大流行打乱了他们的日常生活,使本已资源紧张的环境更加复杂。在这种情况下,员工会保存自己的资源来保持竞争力,其中之一就是知识隐藏。虽然经济活动正在恢复,但新变种的出现可能意味着向地方病的过渡可能会暂停。因此,有必要重新思考员工的行为,因为他们对恢复日常工作活动的焦虑程度会升高。因此,本研究旨在了解员工对知识共享和知识隐藏的看法。设计/方法/方法借鉴资源保护理论、社会学习理论和社会交换理论(SET),开发了一个涉及伦理领导的概念框架,以检查知识隐藏或知识共享行为在这些时期是否是员工的资源。采用结构方程模型的偏最小二乘法对271名新加坡白领员工的调查结果进行分析。研究结果表明,伦理型领导鼓励知识共享,但不能减少知识隐藏。同时,知识隐藏,而不是知识共享,提高了人们对工作绩效的感知。此外,心理安全是减少知识隐藏和鼓励分享行为的关键结构。原创性/价值总体而言,本研究扩展了理论,首先证明知识隐藏是一种资源形式,为员工在流行期间的工作绩效提供了额外的优势。同时,我们提供了一个新的视角,即道德领导者仅表现出正直、诚实和利他主义不足以鼓励知识共享或减少知识隐藏。它必须带来一个心理安全的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信