Narrative and Theodicy in Paradise Lost

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 POETRY
S. Fallon
{"title":"Narrative and Theodicy in Paradise Lost","authors":"S. Fallon","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2019.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Milton famously claims that in Paradise Lost he will \"assert eternal providence, / And justify the ways of God to men.\" Does he succeed? This article argues that Milton's epic, by the criteria of Immanuel Kant, for whom Milton was an immensely influential predecessor, inevitably fails as a philosophical theodicy. On the other hand, the article argues that Paradise Lost succeeds as a narrative of a fall that readers can experience as free rather than determined, and moreover that it succeeds as an example of what Kant termed \"authentic theodicy.\"","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"61 1","pages":"40 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2019.0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2019.0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:Milton famously claims that in Paradise Lost he will "assert eternal providence, / And justify the ways of God to men." Does he succeed? This article argues that Milton's epic, by the criteria of Immanuel Kant, for whom Milton was an immensely influential predecessor, inevitably fails as a philosophical theodicy. On the other hand, the article argues that Paradise Lost succeeds as a narrative of a fall that readers can experience as free rather than determined, and moreover that it succeeds as an example of what Kant termed "authentic theodicy."
《失乐园》中的叙事与狄奥多西
弥尔顿在《失乐园》中宣称,他将“坚持永恒的天意,并为上帝对人类的方式辩护”。他成功了吗?这篇文章认为,按照伊曼努尔·康德的标准,弥尔顿的史诗,作为哲学的神正论,不可避免地失败了。另一方面,这篇文章认为,《失乐园》成功地叙述了一种堕落,读者可以自由地体验堕落,而不是被决定,此外,它成功地成为康德所谓的“真正的神正论”的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信