Comparison of reproductive success between parent-reared and hand-reared northern bald ibis Geronticus eremita in captivity during Proyecto Eremita

IF 0.7 Q4 ZOOLOGY
A. González, M. Quevedo, M. Cuadrado
{"title":"Comparison of reproductive success between parent-reared and hand-reared northern bald ibis Geronticus eremita in captivity during Proyecto Eremita","authors":"A. González, M. Quevedo, M. Cuadrado","doi":"10.19227/JZAR.V8I4.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern zoos actively collaborate in the conservation of many endangered species by captive breeding for reintroduction. This paper presents the reproductive success of a captive colony of northern bald ibis Geronticus eremita (NBI) at ZooBotanico de Jerez between 1993 and 2013 (21 years). Between 2004 and 2011 was “Proyecto Eremita”, a study of the best releasing techniques for hand-reared NBI in Cadiz in order to establish a free-range, self-sustained population in the wild. During this period, first-clutch eggs were artificially incubated and chicks were hand reared until fledgling stage, allowing the pair to produce a second or replacement clutch that was parent reared. This paper compares the colony’s reproductive success between the years where one single clutch was reared by the pairs (n=13) and the years of Proyecto Eremita (n=8), with two clutches, the first hand reared and the second parent reared. The reproductive success rate was measured in 300 nests. A total of 268 fledglings reached 2 months old, the age considered here as the reproductive success. Two reproductive variables were significantly higher during the Proyecto Eremita years: mean number of fledglings per nest (1.8 versus 0.3) and overall number of fledglings recorded per year (26.5 versus 4.3). The reproductive success of hand-reared clutches was similar to parent-reared clutches. There was a significant and negative effect of colony size on the percentage of birds paired and on reproductive success. Parent-reared clutches during the Proyecto Eremita showed a higher reproductive success compared to parent-reared clutches outside this period. The data show that a remarkably high percentage of mating pairs outside of the Proyecto Eremita period failed at reproduction, probably due to density-dependent effects. The combination of hand-rearing and parent-rearing methods used in this study was a very effective tool to significantly increase the number of fledglings produced for the reintroduction programme.","PeriodicalId":56160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"246-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19227/JZAR.V8I4.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Modern zoos actively collaborate in the conservation of many endangered species by captive breeding for reintroduction. This paper presents the reproductive success of a captive colony of northern bald ibis Geronticus eremita (NBI) at ZooBotanico de Jerez between 1993 and 2013 (21 years). Between 2004 and 2011 was “Proyecto Eremita”, a study of the best releasing techniques for hand-reared NBI in Cadiz in order to establish a free-range, self-sustained population in the wild. During this period, first-clutch eggs were artificially incubated and chicks were hand reared until fledgling stage, allowing the pair to produce a second or replacement clutch that was parent reared. This paper compares the colony’s reproductive success between the years where one single clutch was reared by the pairs (n=13) and the years of Proyecto Eremita (n=8), with two clutches, the first hand reared and the second parent reared. The reproductive success rate was measured in 300 nests. A total of 268 fledglings reached 2 months old, the age considered here as the reproductive success. Two reproductive variables were significantly higher during the Proyecto Eremita years: mean number of fledglings per nest (1.8 versus 0.3) and overall number of fledglings recorded per year (26.5 versus 4.3). The reproductive success of hand-reared clutches was similar to parent-reared clutches. There was a significant and negative effect of colony size on the percentage of birds paired and on reproductive success. Parent-reared clutches during the Proyecto Eremita showed a higher reproductive success compared to parent-reared clutches outside this period. The data show that a remarkably high percentage of mating pairs outside of the Proyecto Eremita period failed at reproduction, probably due to density-dependent effects. The combination of hand-rearing and parent-rearing methods used in this study was a very effective tool to significantly increase the number of fledglings produced for the reintroduction programme.
人工饲养与人工饲养北方白头朱鹮繁殖成功率的比较
现代动物园积极合作保护许多濒危物种,通过圈养繁殖重新引入。本文介绍了1993年至2013年(21年)在赫雷斯动物园(ZooBotanico de Jerez)圈养的北方秃头朱鹭(Geronticus eremita, NBI)的繁殖成功率。2004年至2011年期间,“Proyecto Eremita”研究了加的斯人工饲养NBI的最佳放生技术,目的是在野外建立一个自由放养、自给自足的种群。在此期间,第一窝蛋是人工孵化的,小鸡是手工饲养的,直到羽翼未出,让这对夫妇生产第二窝或替代窝,由父母饲养。本文比较了一对育雏单窝(n=13)和一对育雏单窝(n=8)育雏双窝(n=8)的繁殖成功率。在300个巢中测量了繁殖成功率。总共有268只雏鸟达到了2个月大,这个年龄被认为是繁殖成功的年龄。两个繁殖变量:平均每个巢的雏鸟数(1.8对0.3)和每年记录的雏鸟总数(26.5对4.3)在proecto Eremita年显著增加。人工饲养的卵群繁殖成功率与亲代饲养的卵群相似。种群大小对配对比例和繁殖成功率有显著的负向影响。与这一时期之外的父辈饲养的卵群相比,父辈饲养的卵群表现出更高的繁殖成功率。数据显示,在Proyecto Eremita时期以外的交配对中,有相当高的比例未能繁殖,这可能是由于密度依赖效应。本研究中使用的人工饲养和父母饲养相结合的方法是一种非常有效的工具,可以显著增加为重新引入计划生产的雏鸟数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信