Donegal: the Irish Revolution, 1912–23. By Pauric Travers. Pp 183. Dublin: Four Courts Press. 2022. € 24.95.

IF 0.3 1区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Patrick Mulroe
{"title":"Donegal: the Irish Revolution, 1912–23. By Pauric Travers. Pp 183. Dublin: Four Courts Press. 2022. € 24.95.","authors":"Patrick Mulroe","doi":"10.1017/ihs.2023.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roberts available at the Dublin City Library and Archives). In July 1916, Drury contracted malaria. For an entire year, he was away from his battalion, returning to Salonika in July 1917, shortly before his unit was ordered to move to Egypt and Palestine (chapter 7). British strategies sought to capture Jerusalem, split the Ottoman Empire and expand Britain’s control over the Middle East. Though they did not participate in the capture of Jerusalem, the 6 Royal Dublin Fusiliers spent four months in the region and marvelled at the landscape of exceptional beauty. Only in December 1917 did they get involved in the defence the Holy City from a Turkish counter-attack (chapter 8), before being sent to France in September 1918 (chapter 9). Quite surprisingly, the armistice (chapter 10) did not meet with any degree of enthusiasm; Drury and his men would have liked nothing more than to ‘get the dirty hounds with the bayonet’ (p. 289). Here, it is worth wondering if battalions less engaged in combat held on to a strong desire to keep fighting. Did little exposure to violence suffice to explain that enthusiasm? Was revenge powerful enough to breed such feeling? Or were these few lines added several years after the conflict had ended? Drury’s loyalty unconditionally lay with the British Empire, as did that of many serving Irishmen at the time. In pondering the motivations of men for enlisting, Drury opined that ‘shame must have been the deciding factor: how could one stay behind when every letter, every article in the papers, every dispatch, called urgently for help for ourmen in France, apparently with their backs to the wall’ (p. 27). This interpretation of volunteering is intriguing; it is not something academics have written about and something which deserves fuller attention. With this additional volume, Grayson not only gives a voice to a Protestant Irishman, but he also tells the academic world, and the public at large, about the sacrifice of all the Irish soldiers and officers who volunteered during the First World War. Grayson’s research at large is of vital importance, even so today. Recently, the Republic of Ireland has participated in centenary commemorations and honoured the memory of all the Irish who had fallen during the conflict. But a resurgence of vivid resentment coupled with contemporary politics has tarnished the all-inclusive spirit advocated by PresidentMichael D. Higgins. On 4 November 2022, the headquarters of the Royal British Legion in Dublin was vandalised by a selfproclaimed group of anti-imperialists. Drury would have no doubt have voiced his disgust at such action, seeing in this act some memorial terrorism spurred by hatred and ignorance. The making of any collective national memory will always be compounded by historical distortions and fabricated myths. And even today, it is much easier to assert that a handful of badly organised rebels liberated the country rather than recognising that 210,000 Irishmen risked their lives for the defence of the British Empire and for Ireland.","PeriodicalId":44187,"journal":{"name":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2023.20","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roberts available at the Dublin City Library and Archives). In July 1916, Drury contracted malaria. For an entire year, he was away from his battalion, returning to Salonika in July 1917, shortly before his unit was ordered to move to Egypt and Palestine (chapter 7). British strategies sought to capture Jerusalem, split the Ottoman Empire and expand Britain’s control over the Middle East. Though they did not participate in the capture of Jerusalem, the 6 Royal Dublin Fusiliers spent four months in the region and marvelled at the landscape of exceptional beauty. Only in December 1917 did they get involved in the defence the Holy City from a Turkish counter-attack (chapter 8), before being sent to France in September 1918 (chapter 9). Quite surprisingly, the armistice (chapter 10) did not meet with any degree of enthusiasm; Drury and his men would have liked nothing more than to ‘get the dirty hounds with the bayonet’ (p. 289). Here, it is worth wondering if battalions less engaged in combat held on to a strong desire to keep fighting. Did little exposure to violence suffice to explain that enthusiasm? Was revenge powerful enough to breed such feeling? Or were these few lines added several years after the conflict had ended? Drury’s loyalty unconditionally lay with the British Empire, as did that of many serving Irishmen at the time. In pondering the motivations of men for enlisting, Drury opined that ‘shame must have been the deciding factor: how could one stay behind when every letter, every article in the papers, every dispatch, called urgently for help for ourmen in France, apparently with their backs to the wall’ (p. 27). This interpretation of volunteering is intriguing; it is not something academics have written about and something which deserves fuller attention. With this additional volume, Grayson not only gives a voice to a Protestant Irishman, but he also tells the academic world, and the public at large, about the sacrifice of all the Irish soldiers and officers who volunteered during the First World War. Grayson’s research at large is of vital importance, even so today. Recently, the Republic of Ireland has participated in centenary commemorations and honoured the memory of all the Irish who had fallen during the conflict. But a resurgence of vivid resentment coupled with contemporary politics has tarnished the all-inclusive spirit advocated by PresidentMichael D. Higgins. On 4 November 2022, the headquarters of the Royal British Legion in Dublin was vandalised by a selfproclaimed group of anti-imperialists. Drury would have no doubt have voiced his disgust at such action, seeing in this act some memorial terrorism spurred by hatred and ignorance. The making of any collective national memory will always be compounded by historical distortions and fabricated myths. And even today, it is much easier to assert that a handful of badly organised rebels liberated the country rather than recognising that 210,000 Irishmen risked their lives for the defence of the British Empire and for Ireland.
多尼戈尔:爱尔兰革命,1912 - 1923年。保罗·特拉弗斯著。页183。都柏林:四法院出版社,2022。€24.95。
罗伯茨可以在都柏林城市图书馆和档案馆找到)。1916年7月,德鲁里感染了疟疾。1917年7月,在他的部队被命令前往埃及和巴勒斯坦之前不久,他离开了他的营,回到了萨洛尼卡(Salonika)。英国的战略是夺取耶路撒冷,分裂奥斯曼帝国,扩大英国对中东的控制。虽然他们没有参与占领耶路撒冷,但6名皇家都柏林燧发枪兵在该地区呆了4个月,对那里异常美丽的景观感到惊叹。直到1917年12月,他们才参与保卫圣城,抵御土耳其人的反击(第8章),然后在1918年9月被派往法国(第9章)。令人惊讶的是,停战(第10章)没有受到任何程度的热情;德鲁里和他的手下最喜欢的就是“用刺刀干掉肮脏的猎犬”(第289页)。在这里,值得思考的是,较少参与战斗的营是否保持着继续战斗的强烈愿望。很少接触暴力足以解释这种热情吗?复仇的力量足以产生这种感觉吗?或者这几句话是在冲突结束几年后加上去的?德鲁里无条件地忠于大英帝国,就像当时许多服役的爱尔兰人一样。在思考人们参军的动机时,德鲁里认为“羞耻感一定是决定因素:当每一封信、报纸上的每一篇文章、每一份急迫地要求为我们在法国的士兵提供帮助时,我们怎么能留下来呢?”(第27页)。这种对志愿服务的解读很有趣;这不是学者们写过的东西,也不是值得更充分关注的东西。在这本新书中,格雷森不仅表达了一个爱尔兰新教徒的心声,而且还向学术界和广大公众讲述了第一次世界大战期间志愿参加战争的所有爱尔兰士兵和军官的牺牲。即使在今天,格雷森的研究总体上也是至关重要的。最近,爱尔兰共和国参加了百年纪念活动,纪念在冲突中牺牲的所有爱尔兰人。但是,鲜明的怨恨情绪卷土重来,再加上当代政治,已经玷污了迈克尔·d·希金斯(michael D. Higgins)总统倡导的包容一切的精神。2022年11月4日,都柏林的英国皇家军团总部遭到一群自称反帝国主义者的破坏。德鲁里无疑会对这种行为表示厌恶,认为这是一种由仇恨和无知引发的纪念恐怖主义。任何集体民族记忆的形成总是伴随着历史扭曲和虚构的神话。即使在今天,断言是少数组织糟糕的叛军解放了这个国家,也比承认21万爱尔兰人冒着生命危险保卫大英帝国和爱尔兰要容易得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal is published jointly by the Irish Historical Society and the Ulster Society for Irish Historical Studies. Published twice a year, Irish Historical Studies covers all areas of Irish history, including the medieval period. We thank William E. Vaughn of the management committee of Irish Historical Studies for his permission to republish the following two articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信