On Bayesian credibility mean for finite mixture distributions

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ehsan Jahanbani, Amir T. Payandeh Najafabadi, Khaled Masoumifard
{"title":"On Bayesian credibility mean for finite mixture distributions","authors":"Ehsan Jahanbani, Amir T. Payandeh Najafabadi, Khaled Masoumifard","doi":"10.1017/s1748499523000076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Consider the problem of determining the Bayesian credibility mean \n \n \n \n$E(X_{n+1}|X_1,\\cdots, X_n),$\n\n \n whenever the random claims \n \n \n \n$X_1,\\cdots, X_n,$\n\n \n given parameter vector \n \n \n \n$\\boldsymbol{\\Psi},$\n\n \n are sampled from the K-component mixture family of distributions, whose members are the union of different families of distributions. This article begins by deriving a recursive formula for such a Bayesian credibility mean. Moreover, under the assumption that using additional information \n \n \n \n$Z_{i,1},\\cdots,Z_{i,m},$\n\n \n one may probabilistically determine a random claim \n \n \n \n$X_i$\n\n \n belongs to a given population (or a distribution), the above recursive formula simplifies to an exact Bayesian credibility mean whenever all components of the mixture distribution belong to the exponential families of distributions. For a situation where a 2-component mixture family of distributions is an appropriate choice for data modelling, using the logistic regression model, it shows that: how one may employ such additional information to derive the Bayesian credibility model, say Logistic Regression Credibility model, for a finite mixture of distributions. A comparison between the Logistic Regression Credibility (LRC) model and its competitor, the Regression Tree Credibility (RTC) model, has been given. More precisely, it shows that under the squared error loss function, it shows the LRC’s risk function dominates the RTC’s risk function at least in an interval which about \n \n \n \n$0.5.$\n\n \n Several examples have been given to illustrate the practical application of our findings.","PeriodicalId":44135,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Actuarial Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Actuarial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499523000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consider the problem of determining the Bayesian credibility mean $E(X_{n+1}|X_1,\cdots, X_n),$ whenever the random claims $X_1,\cdots, X_n,$ given parameter vector $\boldsymbol{\Psi},$ are sampled from the K-component mixture family of distributions, whose members are the union of different families of distributions. This article begins by deriving a recursive formula for such a Bayesian credibility mean. Moreover, under the assumption that using additional information $Z_{i,1},\cdots,Z_{i,m},$ one may probabilistically determine a random claim $X_i$ belongs to a given population (or a distribution), the above recursive formula simplifies to an exact Bayesian credibility mean whenever all components of the mixture distribution belong to the exponential families of distributions. For a situation where a 2-component mixture family of distributions is an appropriate choice for data modelling, using the logistic regression model, it shows that: how one may employ such additional information to derive the Bayesian credibility model, say Logistic Regression Credibility model, for a finite mixture of distributions. A comparison between the Logistic Regression Credibility (LRC) model and its competitor, the Regression Tree Credibility (RTC) model, has been given. More precisely, it shows that under the squared error loss function, it shows the LRC’s risk function dominates the RTC’s risk function at least in an interval which about $0.5.$ Several examples have been given to illustrate the practical application of our findings.
有限混合分布的贝叶斯可信度均值
考虑确定贝叶斯可信度均值$E(X_{n+1}|X_1,\cdots,X_n),$的问题,只要随机声明$X_1,/cdots,X_n,$给定的参数向量$\boldsymbol{\Psi},$是从K分量混合分布族中采样的,其成员是不同分布族的并集。本文首先推导出这样一个贝叶斯可信度均值的递归公式。此外,在假设使用附加信息$Z_{i,1},\cdots,Z_{i,m},$one可以概率地确定随机声明$X_i$属于给定的总体(或分布)的情况下,只要混合分布的所有分量都属于指数分布族,上述递归公式就简化为精确的贝叶斯可信度均值。对于双组分混合分布族是数据建模的合适选择的情况,使用逻辑回归模型,它表明:如何利用这些额外信息来推导有限混合分布的贝叶斯可信度模型,比如逻辑回归可信度模型。将逻辑回归可信度(LRC)模型与其竞争对手回归树可信度(RTC)模型进行了比较。更准确地说,它表明,在平方误差损失函数下,它表明LRC的风险函数至少在大约0.5美元的区间内主导RTC的风险函数。$已经给出了几个例子来说明我们的发现的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信