Environmental justice beyond physical access: rethinking Black American utilization of urban public green spaces

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Eunyque Sykes
{"title":"Environmental justice beyond physical access: rethinking Black American utilization of urban public green spaces","authors":"Eunyque Sykes","doi":"10.1080/23251042.2022.2057649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Black Americans have historically reported aversive attitudes towards the outdoors. First, cultural meanings of the natural world are shaped by historical legacies of racial violence and racialized slavery. Second, public policies after slavery continued to reproduce the separation of Black Americans from green spaces. Thus, Black Americans have developed preferences for more cultivated green spaces as an adaptation to these structural exclusions. This study explored how Black women participating in outdoor activities in Franklin Park experienced the outdoors. The Black women interviewed reported managing facial and bodily expressions, when they are participating in outdoor activities outside of Franklin Park, in order to negotiate the contradictions of racialized outdoor spaces. To explain this, I developed the concept of racialized emotional labor which is: (1) mediation of structural and/or individual racism: required to participate in dynamics where they are systematically racially objectified, (2) hyperawareness of Blackness: required to participate in the minimization of their racial objectification. This study argues that Black women engage in racialized emotional labor in uncultivated green spaces and rural areas because the areas aren't welcoming towards Black people and do not foster a sense of comfortability and belonging, compared to urban parks with diverse crowds like Franklin Park.","PeriodicalId":54173,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2057649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Black Americans have historically reported aversive attitudes towards the outdoors. First, cultural meanings of the natural world are shaped by historical legacies of racial violence and racialized slavery. Second, public policies after slavery continued to reproduce the separation of Black Americans from green spaces. Thus, Black Americans have developed preferences for more cultivated green spaces as an adaptation to these structural exclusions. This study explored how Black women participating in outdoor activities in Franklin Park experienced the outdoors. The Black women interviewed reported managing facial and bodily expressions, when they are participating in outdoor activities outside of Franklin Park, in order to negotiate the contradictions of racialized outdoor spaces. To explain this, I developed the concept of racialized emotional labor which is: (1) mediation of structural and/or individual racism: required to participate in dynamics where they are systematically racially objectified, (2) hyperawareness of Blackness: required to participate in the minimization of their racial objectification. This study argues that Black women engage in racialized emotional labor in uncultivated green spaces and rural areas because the areas aren't welcoming towards Black people and do not foster a sense of comfortability and belonging, compared to urban parks with diverse crowds like Franklin Park.
超越物质获取的环境正义:重新思考美国黑人对城市公共绿地的利用
摘要美国黑人历来对户外活动持厌恶态度。首先,自然世界的文化意义是由种族暴力和种族化奴隶制的历史遗产塑造的。其次,奴隶制之后的公共政策继续再现美国黑人与绿地的分离。因此,作为对这些结构性排斥的适应,美国黑人对更为耕种的绿地产生了偏好。这项研究探讨了在富兰克林公园参加户外活动的黑人女性如何体验户外活动。接受采访的黑人女性报告说,当她们在富兰克林公园外参加户外活动时,为了解决种族化户外空间的矛盾,她们会管理面部和身体表情。为了解释这一点,我提出了种族化情感劳动的概念,即:(1)结构和/或个人种族主义的中介:需要参与他们被系统地种族客体化的动态,(2)黑人的超意识:需要参与最小化他们的种族客体化。这项研究认为,与富兰克林公园等人群众多的城市公园相比,黑人女性在未开垦的绿地和农村地区从事种族化的情感劳动,因为这些地区不欢迎黑人,也不培养舒适感和归属感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sociology
Environmental Sociology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Environmental Sociology is dedicated to applying and advancing the sociological imagination in relation to a wide variety of environmental challenges, controversies and issues, at every level from the global to local, from ‘world culture’ to diverse local perspectives. As an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, Environmental Sociology aims to stretch the conceptual and theoretical boundaries of both environmental and mainstream sociology, to highlight the relevance of sociological research for environmental policy and management, to disseminate the results of sociological research, and to engage in productive dialogue and debate with other disciplines in the social, natural and ecological sciences. Contributions may utilize a variety of theoretical orientations including, but not restricted to: critical theory, cultural sociology, ecofeminism, ecological modernization, environmental justice, organizational sociology, political ecology, political economy, post-colonial studies, risk theory, social psychology, science and technology studies, globalization, world-systems analysis, and so on. Cross- and transdisciplinary contributions are welcome where they demonstrate a novel attempt to understand social-ecological relationships in a manner that engages with the core concerns of sociology in social relationships, institutions, practices and processes. All methodological approaches in the environmental social sciences – qualitative, quantitative, integrative, spatial, policy analysis, etc. – are welcomed. Environmental Sociology welcomes high-quality submissions from scholars around the world.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信