Microplastic Pollution in Surface Waters of Urban Watersheds in Central Texas, United States: A Comparison of Sites With and Without Treated Wastewater Effluent

J. Stovall, S. Bratton
{"title":"Microplastic Pollution in Surface Waters of Urban Watersheds in Central Texas, United States: A Comparison of Sites With and Without Treated Wastewater Effluent","authors":"J. Stovall, S. Bratton","doi":"10.3389/frans.2022.857694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies of microplastics in freshwater have investigated presence in creeks and rivers below sewage effluents and storm drains. This study examines microplastic distribution in surface waters, including springs and primary streams, located within small, urban Karst watersheds, with and without sources of wastewater treatment discharge. Study locales were in Texas, United States, either in Waco on the Brazos River or in or downstream from San Marcos on the San Marcos River. Research teams collected 800 ml surface water from four different small watersheds and an urban pond (n = 779) and filtered them through 53 μm Nitex mesh. Teams collected samples from springs or primary streams to the lower end of creeks and across stream transects based on distance from the bank and the presence of vegetation and debris. Teams also replicated samples seasonally. Stereo microscopy examined each filter for microplastic particles and subsequently color and type (i.e., fragment, fiber, or sphere). Additionally, we analyzed the influence of urbanization and land use on the origin and transport of the microplastics. Overall, the filters recovered 1,198 microplastic fibers and fragments. On average, 56.7% of all samples at each study locale contained microplastics. Particle abundance was the highest at Proctor Springs ( x ¯ = 3.38 ) and lowest at the pond ( x ¯ = 0.98 ) , both headwaters. Local human use and runoff were thus potentially important factors in microplastic presence, while sewage discharge was not unilaterally the primary determinant of microplastic abundance. Peak pollution events occurred in June, September, and October, indicating seasonality of rainfall and recreation affected microplastic frequency and type.","PeriodicalId":73063,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in analytical science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in analytical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2022.857694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Most studies of microplastics in freshwater have investigated presence in creeks and rivers below sewage effluents and storm drains. This study examines microplastic distribution in surface waters, including springs and primary streams, located within small, urban Karst watersheds, with and without sources of wastewater treatment discharge. Study locales were in Texas, United States, either in Waco on the Brazos River or in or downstream from San Marcos on the San Marcos River. Research teams collected 800 ml surface water from four different small watersheds and an urban pond (n = 779) and filtered them through 53 μm Nitex mesh. Teams collected samples from springs or primary streams to the lower end of creeks and across stream transects based on distance from the bank and the presence of vegetation and debris. Teams also replicated samples seasonally. Stereo microscopy examined each filter for microplastic particles and subsequently color and type (i.e., fragment, fiber, or sphere). Additionally, we analyzed the influence of urbanization and land use on the origin and transport of the microplastics. Overall, the filters recovered 1,198 microplastic fibers and fragments. On average, 56.7% of all samples at each study locale contained microplastics. Particle abundance was the highest at Proctor Springs ( x ¯ = 3.38 ) and lowest at the pond ( x ¯ = 0.98 ) , both headwaters. Local human use and runoff were thus potentially important factors in microplastic presence, while sewage discharge was not unilaterally the primary determinant of microplastic abundance. Peak pollution events occurred in June, September, and October, indicating seasonality of rainfall and recreation affected microplastic frequency and type.
美国德克萨斯州中部城市流域地表水中的微塑料污染:污水处理和未处理地点的比较
大多数关于淡水中微塑料的研究都调查了污水和暴雨排水沟下方小溪和河流中的微塑料。这项研究考察了地表水中的微塑料分布,包括位于小型城市岩溶流域内的泉水和原生溪流,无论是否有废水处理排放源。研究地点在美国得克萨斯州,要么在布拉佐斯河上的韦科,要么在圣马科斯河上的圣马科斯境内或下游。研究小组从四个不同的小流域和一个城市池塘(n=779)收集了800毫升地表水,并通过53微米的Nitex网过滤。研究小组根据与河岸的距离以及植被和碎屑的存在,从泉水或原始溪流到小溪下端,以及穿过溪流样带收集样本。研究小组还季节性地复制样本。立体显微镜检查了每个过滤器的微塑料颗粒,随后检查了颜色和类型(即碎片、纤维或球体)。此外,我们还分析了城市化和土地利用对微塑料来源和运输的影响。总的来说,过滤器回收了1198个微塑料纤维和碎片。平均而言,每个研究地点56.7%的样本含有微塑料。颗粒丰度在Proctor Springs最高(x’=3.38),在池塘最低(x’=0.98),均为源头。因此,当地人类使用和径流是微塑料存在的潜在重要因素,而污水排放并不是微塑料丰度的主要决定因素。污染高峰发生在6月、9月和10月,表明降雨和娱乐活动的季节性影响了微塑料的频率和类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信