Youth Gang Membership, Marginalized Identities, and Suicidality Disparities: Intersectional Implications for Research and Practice.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s10560-022-00902-z
Asia S Bishop, Paula S Nurius, Christopher M Fleming, Reed T Klein, Ashley N Rousson
{"title":"Youth Gang Membership, Marginalized Identities, and Suicidality Disparities: Intersectional Implications for Research and Practice.","authors":"Asia S Bishop, Paula S Nurius, Christopher M Fleming, Reed T Klein, Ashley N Rousson","doi":"10.1007/s10560-022-00902-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents in the U.S., and emerging evidence indicates that gang-involved youth may be at elevated risk. Yet, little is known about suicidality prevalence among subgroups of gang and non-gang youth due to limited measures of social identity in previous studies. Guided by an intersectional framework, this study examined gang and non-gang differences in suicidality across an array of social identities and tested the effect of gang membership on suicidality within the context of cumulative marginalization. Data come from a statewide, school-based sample of adolescents in the 8th, 10th, and 12th grades (<i>N</i> = 81,080). Chi-square and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests examined group differences in rates of self-reported suicidal ideation, planning, and attempts. Logistic regression models tested the moderating effect of multiple marginalized identities on the gang-suicidality link. Gang-involved youth reported significantly higher suicidality compared to non-gang youth, with between-group disparities observed across singular marginalized identities. However, moderation analyses found that the effect of gang membership on suicidal ideation and planning was less salient in the context of cumulative marginalization. Findings suggest that gang-involved youth represent a unique and diverse population at risk of suicide. At the same time, gang membership may also offer some degree of protection against early stages of suicide for those with a greater number of marginalized identities. Implications for social work science and practice within an intersectional framework are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51512,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","volume":" ","pages":"515-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00902-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents in the U.S., and emerging evidence indicates that gang-involved youth may be at elevated risk. Yet, little is known about suicidality prevalence among subgroups of gang and non-gang youth due to limited measures of social identity in previous studies. Guided by an intersectional framework, this study examined gang and non-gang differences in suicidality across an array of social identities and tested the effect of gang membership on suicidality within the context of cumulative marginalization. Data come from a statewide, school-based sample of adolescents in the 8th, 10th, and 12th grades (N = 81,080). Chi-square and independent samples t-tests examined group differences in rates of self-reported suicidal ideation, planning, and attempts. Logistic regression models tested the moderating effect of multiple marginalized identities on the gang-suicidality link. Gang-involved youth reported significantly higher suicidality compared to non-gang youth, with between-group disparities observed across singular marginalized identities. However, moderation analyses found that the effect of gang membership on suicidal ideation and planning was less salient in the context of cumulative marginalization. Findings suggest that gang-involved youth represent a unique and diverse population at risk of suicide. At the same time, gang membership may also offer some degree of protection against early stages of suicide for those with a greater number of marginalized identities. Implications for social work science and practice within an intersectional framework are discussed.

青年帮派成员、边缘化身份和自杀差异:研究与实践的交叉意义
自杀是美国青少年死亡的第二大原因,而且越来越多的证据表明,参与帮派的青少年自杀的风险可能更高。然而,由于以前的研究中对社会认同的测量有限,对帮派和非帮派青年亚群体中的自杀流行率知之甚少。在交叉框架的指导下,本研究在一系列社会身份中考察了帮派和非帮派在自杀方面的差异,并在累积边缘化的背景下测试了帮派成员对自杀的影响。数据来自全州范围内以学校为基础的8年级、10年级和12年级青少年样本(N = 81,080)。卡方检验和独立样本t检验检验了自我报告的自杀意念、计划和企图率的组间差异。Logistic回归模型检验了多重边缘身份对帮派-自杀关联的调节作用。与非帮派青年相比,帮派青年的自杀率明显更高,群体之间的差异在单一的边缘身份中观察到。然而,适度分析发现,在累积边缘化的背景下,帮派成员对自杀意念和计划的影响不那么显著。研究结果表明,参与帮派的青少年代表了一个独特的、多样化的有自杀风险的群体。与此同时,帮派成员也可能在一定程度上保护那些有更多边缘身份的人免受早期自杀的影响。在交叉框架内讨论社会工作科学和实践的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (CASW) features original articles that focus on social work practice with children, adolescents, and their families. Topics include issues affecting a variety of specific populations in special settings.  CASW welcomes a range of scholarly contributions focused on children and adolescents, including theoretical papers, narrative case studies, historical analyses, traditional reviews of the literature, descriptive studies, single-system research designs, correlational investigations, methodological works, pre-experimental, quasi-experimental and experimental evaluations, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Manuscripts involving qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are welcome to be submitted, as are papers grounded in one or more theoretical orientations, or those that are not based on any formal theory. CASW values different disciplines and interdisciplinary work that informs social work practice and policy. Authors from public health, nursing, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines are encouraged to submit manuscripts. All manuscripts should include specific implications for social work policy and practice with children and adolescents. Appropriate fields of practice include interpersonal practice, small groups, families, organizations, communities, policy practice, nationally-oriented work, and international studies.  Authors considering publication in CASW should review the following editorial: Schelbe, L., & Thyer, B. A. (2019). Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Editorial Policy: Guidelines for Authors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 75-80.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信