A systematic review of green building practices implementation in Africa

IF 2.2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Andrew Ebekozien, C. Aigbavboa, W. Thwala, G. C. Amadi, Marvelous Aigbedion, Iliye Faith Ogbaini
{"title":"A systematic review of green building practices implementation in Africa","authors":"Andrew Ebekozien, C. Aigbavboa, W. Thwala, G. C. Amadi, Marvelous Aigbedion, Iliye Faith Ogbaini","doi":"10.1108/jfm-09-2021-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review on encumbrances facing the implementation of GBP in selected African countries. Green building practices (GBP) implementation is germane and promotes the development of a green environment and buildings. Many studies have been conducted on the encumbrances faced with GBP implementation, especially in developing countries. But evidence of a comprehensive study that investigates and analyses these hindrances from different developing countries is missing. Therefore, a systematic review is conducted systematically reviewing the current literature on encumbrances facing the implementation of GBP in selected African countries. Also, the study proffers possible drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP in African countries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 38 published papers were identified from the Web of Science, Scopus database and supported with materials from Google Scholar related to Africa’s GBP. The continent was divided into five regions, and each region covered three countries.\n\n\nFindings\nTwo themes emerged from the analysed review – encumbrances facing GBP implementation and possible drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP in African countries. A total of 18 encumbrances and 18 drivers were identified from the analysed literature and grouped into 6 sub-themes.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nCurrent empirical articles were reviewed to suggest the drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP that emerged from this paper. Thus, to enrich the results from this paper, primary source data of regional studies of GBP in Africa’s context should be carried out via the mixed-methods design.\n\n\nPractical implications\nA total of 18 drivers were identified for stakeholders to promote GBP in Africa and form part of the paper’s implications. Also, the paper findings would serve as a treasured suggestion for the stakeholders (policymakers, construction practitioners, clients and academics) who are fascinated by the promotion of GBP across African nations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is possibly the foremost analysed systematic review study on GBP implementation in Africa. Therefore, it fills the theoretical gap and proffers possible drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP in the African context.\n","PeriodicalId":46544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facilities Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facilities Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-09-2021-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review on encumbrances facing the implementation of GBP in selected African countries. Green building practices (GBP) implementation is germane and promotes the development of a green environment and buildings. Many studies have been conducted on the encumbrances faced with GBP implementation, especially in developing countries. But evidence of a comprehensive study that investigates and analyses these hindrances from different developing countries is missing. Therefore, a systematic review is conducted systematically reviewing the current literature on encumbrances facing the implementation of GBP in selected African countries. Also, the study proffers possible drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP in African countries. Design/methodology/approach A total of 38 published papers were identified from the Web of Science, Scopus database and supported with materials from Google Scholar related to Africa’s GBP. The continent was divided into five regions, and each region covered three countries. Findings Two themes emerged from the analysed review – encumbrances facing GBP implementation and possible drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP in African countries. A total of 18 encumbrances and 18 drivers were identified from the analysed literature and grouped into 6 sub-themes. Research limitations/implications Current empirical articles were reviewed to suggest the drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP that emerged from this paper. Thus, to enrich the results from this paper, primary source data of regional studies of GBP in Africa’s context should be carried out via the mixed-methods design. Practical implications A total of 18 drivers were identified for stakeholders to promote GBP in Africa and form part of the paper’s implications. Also, the paper findings would serve as a treasured suggestion for the stakeholders (policymakers, construction practitioners, clients and academics) who are fascinated by the promotion of GBP across African nations. Originality/value This is possibly the foremost analysed systematic review study on GBP implementation in Africa. Therefore, it fills the theoretical gap and proffers possible drivers for stakeholders to promote GBP in the African context.
对非洲实施绿色建筑做法的系统审查
目的本研究的目的是对选定的非洲国家实施GBP面临的障碍进行系统审查。绿色建筑实践(GBP)的实施与绿色环境和建筑的发展密切相关。对实施英镑面临的障碍进行了许多研究,特别是在发展中国家。但缺乏对不同发展中国家的这些障碍进行调查和分析的全面研究的证据。因此,我们进行了一次系统的审查,系统地审查了关于在选定的非洲国家实施GBP面临的障碍的现有文献。此外,该研究为利益相关者在非洲国家推广英镑提供了可能的驱动因素。设计/方法论/方法共有38篇已发表的论文来自科学网Scopus数据库,并得到谷歌学者与非洲GBP相关材料的支持。非洲大陆被划分为五个区域,每个区域覆盖三个国家。发现分析审查中出现了两个主题——英镑实施面临的障碍以及利益相关者在非洲国家推广英镑的可能驱动因素。从分析的文献中总共确定了18个产权负担和18个驱动因素,并将其分为6个子主题。研究局限性/含义回顾了当前的实证文章,以提出利益相关者推广本文中出现的GBP的驱动因素。因此,为了丰富本文的结果,非洲背景下GBP区域研究的主要来源数据应通过混合方法设计进行。实际影响为利益相关者确定了在非洲推广英镑的18个驱动因素,并构成了论文影响的一部分。此外,论文的研究结果将为利益相关者(政策制定者、建筑从业者、客户和学者)提供宝贵的建议,他们对在非洲国家推广英镑非常着迷。原创性/价值这可能是对英镑在非洲实施情况进行的最重要的系统分析审查研究。因此,它填补了理论空白,并为利益相关者在非洲背景下推广英镑提供了可能的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Journal of Facilities Management is a strategic level journal for Heads of Facilities and Corporate Real Estate. Guided by its international and expert Editorial Board, Journal of Facilities Management publishes high-quality, authoritative, and detailed analysis, briefings and case studies on how facilities can and do play a vital part in helping deliver corporate strategy. This quarterly publication features contributions from leading practitioners and thinkers in the field of Facilities Management, from some of the leading companies, government institutions, and universities in the world. The journal features a combination of theoretical and practical articles, complemented by a wide range of case studies and regular features, identifying key implications for senior practitioners in Facilities Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信