Book Review: Policing & Politics in Latin America: When Law Enforcement Breaks the Law by Esparza, D.

IF 1.4 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P. Bleakley
{"title":"Book Review: Policing & Politics in Latin America: When Law Enforcement Breaks the Law by Esparza, D.","authors":"P. Bleakley","doi":"10.1177/10575677231161783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"part of the world became popular after the incident referred to as The Nirbhaya (the fearless, who tried to fight off six offenders). The author analyzed the pattern of self-reporting in male offenders and found that these kinds of behaviors occurred most often in the company of a friend. Furthermore, 70% of the respondents reported not having an awareness of the existence of laws relating to sexual harassment and their effectiveness. The paradoxes of the public space associated with publicness (i.e., who is eligible to use public space) have been argued in the Study of urban park users: The case of Poznań, Poland by Emilia Bogacka. Urban parks strongly impact the quality of life of the users and help in creating community culture and cohesion in cities. The findings highlight the time dependence of the perception of safety (higher during the day and lower during the darker hours). Interestingly, respondents of this study felt safe in the company of others, but less so in the presence of homeless people or those consuming alcohol. Lighting and video surveillance were reported as important environmental design elements in urban parks to promote feelings of safety. One of the strengths of this book is its multidisciplinary approach to public space with case studies from around the world. In general, the language and structure of the book are easy to follow, and the text is divided into three to 10 subjects that are very easy to choose and study. Additionally, the book has an open access availability that adds to the visibility of the topic and societal benefits at large. An area that seeks improvement in this book is the confusion around the book’s themes and the division of sections. In addition, the lack of strict demarcation of themes makes it difficult to stick to one theme or section. For instance, “transit safety” is not restricted to the theme of movement only. It is one of the main themes available in almost every theme and section. Similarly, “perspective of the users” appears throughout the book and not only in the assigned theme. However, the ‘perspective of the children’ is absent from the user list. Furthermore, the last chapter on “perspective of the planners” is unique with reference to all other chapters in the book. Overall, this book is an outstanding contribution to the series of crime and society by Routledge and is an excellent addition to a growing body of literature on the crime and safety discipline. This book highlights fresh concepts and methodological approaches, as well as its connection to other types of research. The ideas presented in this book are not new, but very well thought out and developed. The authors of this book offer alternative theoretical frameworks and practical case studies on how to effectively understand the significance of users’ relationships with space and navigate the complexity of public spaces when dealing with the issue of fear of crime. It is recommended that anyone creating inclusive and safe public spaces read this book.","PeriodicalId":51797,"journal":{"name":"International Criminal Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Criminal Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677231161783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

part of the world became popular after the incident referred to as The Nirbhaya (the fearless, who tried to fight off six offenders). The author analyzed the pattern of self-reporting in male offenders and found that these kinds of behaviors occurred most often in the company of a friend. Furthermore, 70% of the respondents reported not having an awareness of the existence of laws relating to sexual harassment and their effectiveness. The paradoxes of the public space associated with publicness (i.e., who is eligible to use public space) have been argued in the Study of urban park users: The case of Poznań, Poland by Emilia Bogacka. Urban parks strongly impact the quality of life of the users and help in creating community culture and cohesion in cities. The findings highlight the time dependence of the perception of safety (higher during the day and lower during the darker hours). Interestingly, respondents of this study felt safe in the company of others, but less so in the presence of homeless people or those consuming alcohol. Lighting and video surveillance were reported as important environmental design elements in urban parks to promote feelings of safety. One of the strengths of this book is its multidisciplinary approach to public space with case studies from around the world. In general, the language and structure of the book are easy to follow, and the text is divided into three to 10 subjects that are very easy to choose and study. Additionally, the book has an open access availability that adds to the visibility of the topic and societal benefits at large. An area that seeks improvement in this book is the confusion around the book’s themes and the division of sections. In addition, the lack of strict demarcation of themes makes it difficult to stick to one theme or section. For instance, “transit safety” is not restricted to the theme of movement only. It is one of the main themes available in almost every theme and section. Similarly, “perspective of the users” appears throughout the book and not only in the assigned theme. However, the ‘perspective of the children’ is absent from the user list. Furthermore, the last chapter on “perspective of the planners” is unique with reference to all other chapters in the book. Overall, this book is an outstanding contribution to the series of crime and society by Routledge and is an excellent addition to a growing body of literature on the crime and safety discipline. This book highlights fresh concepts and methodological approaches, as well as its connection to other types of research. The ideas presented in this book are not new, but very well thought out and developed. The authors of this book offer alternative theoretical frameworks and practical case studies on how to effectively understand the significance of users’ relationships with space and navigate the complexity of public spaces when dealing with the issue of fear of crime. It is recommended that anyone creating inclusive and safe public spaces read this book.
书评:《拉丁美洲的警务与政治:当执法部门违法时》,作者:埃斯帕萨博士。
事件发生后,世界上的一部分地区变得流行起来,被称为“Nirbhaya”(无畏的人,试图击退六名罪犯)。作者分析了男性罪犯的自我报告模式,发现这类行为最常发生在朋友的陪伴下。此外,70%的受访者表示,他们不知道是否存在与性骚扰有关的法律及其有效性。Emilia Bogacka在《城市公园使用者研究:波兰波兹南的案例》中提出了与公共性相关的公共空间悖论(即谁有资格使用公共空间)。城市公园强烈影响着使用者的生活质量,有助于在城市中创造社区文化和凝聚力。研究结果强调了安全感的时间依赖性(白天更高,黑暗时间更低)。有趣的是,这项研究的受访者在他人的陪伴下感到安全,但在无家可归的人或饮酒的人面前就不那么安全了。照明和视频监控被报道为城市公园的重要环境设计元素,以促进安全感。这本书的优势之一是它对公共空间的多学科方法,以及来自世界各地的案例研究。总的来说,这本书的语言和结构很容易理解,正文分为三到十个科目,非常容易选择和学习。此外,这本书具有开放获取的功能,增加了主题的可见性和整体社会效益。本书寻求改进的一个领域是围绕本书主题和章节划分的混乱。此外,由于缺乏对主题的严格划分,很难拘泥于一个主题或章节。例如,“运输安全”不仅限于运动的主题。它是几乎每一个主题和章节中可用的主要主题之一。类似地,“用户视角”出现在整本书中,而不仅仅出现在指定的主题中。然而,用户列表中没有“儿童视角”。此外,关于“规划者的视角”的最后一章与书中的其他章节相比是独一无二的。总的来说,这本书是劳特利奇对《犯罪与社会》系列的杰出贡献,也是对越来越多的犯罪与安全学科文献的优秀补充。这本书强调了新的概念和方法,以及它与其他类型研究的联系。这本书中提出的观点并不新鲜,但经过了很好的思考和发展。本书的作者提供了替代性的理论框架和实践案例研究,探讨如何在处理对犯罪的恐惧问题时有效理解用户与空间关系的重要性,并驾驭公共空间的复杂性。建议任何创造包容和安全的公共空间的人阅读这本书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Criminal Justice Review
International Criminal Justice Review CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: International Criminal Justice Review is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting system wide trends and problems on crime and justice throughout the world. Articles may focus on a single country or compare issues affecting two or more countries. Both qualitative and quantitative pieces are encouraged, providing they adhere to standards of quality scholarship. Manuscripts may emphasize either contemporary or historical topics. As a peer-reviewed journal, we encourage the submission of articles, research notes, and commentaries that focus on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics in an international and/or comparative context.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信