Cross-linguistic variation in space-based distance for size depiction in the lexicons of six sign languages

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Victoria Nyst
{"title":"Cross-linguistic variation in space-based distance for size depiction in the lexicons of six sign\n languages","authors":"Victoria Nyst","doi":"10.1075/SLL.00024.NYS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a semiotic study of the distribution of a type of size depiction in lexical signs in six sign\n languages. Recently, a growing number of studies are focusing on the distribution of two representation techniques, i.e. the use\n of entity handshapes and handling handshapes for the depiction of hand-held tools (e.g. Ortega\n et al. 2014). Padden et al. (2013) find that there is cross-linguistic\n variation in the use of this pair of representation techniques. This study looks at variation in a representation technique that\n has not been systematically studied before, i.e. the delimitation of a stretch of space to depict the size of a referent, or\n space-based distance for size depiction. It considers the question whether the cross-linguistic variation in\n the use of this representation technique is governed by language-specific patterning as well (cf. Padden et al. 2013).\n This study quantifies and compares the occurrence of space-based distance for size depiction in\n the lexicons of six sign languages, three of Western European origin, and three of West African origin. It finds that sign\n languages differ significantly from each other in their frequency of use of this depiction type. This result thus corroborates\n that the selection and distribution of representation techniques does not solely depend on features of the depicted image, but\n also on language-specific patterning in the distribution of representation techniques, and it adds another dimension of iconic\n depiction in which sign languages may vary from each other (in addition to the entity/handling handshape distinction). Moreover,\n the results appear to be areally defined, with the three European languages using this representation technique significantly more\n often than the three African languages.","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00024.NYS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper presents a semiotic study of the distribution of a type of size depiction in lexical signs in six sign languages. Recently, a growing number of studies are focusing on the distribution of two representation techniques, i.e. the use of entity handshapes and handling handshapes for the depiction of hand-held tools (e.g. Ortega et al. 2014). Padden et al. (2013) find that there is cross-linguistic variation in the use of this pair of representation techniques. This study looks at variation in a representation technique that has not been systematically studied before, i.e. the delimitation of a stretch of space to depict the size of a referent, or space-based distance for size depiction. It considers the question whether the cross-linguistic variation in the use of this representation technique is governed by language-specific patterning as well (cf. Padden et al. 2013). This study quantifies and compares the occurrence of space-based distance for size depiction in the lexicons of six sign languages, three of Western European origin, and three of West African origin. It finds that sign languages differ significantly from each other in their frequency of use of this depiction type. This result thus corroborates that the selection and distribution of representation techniques does not solely depend on features of the depicted image, but also on language-specific patterning in the distribution of representation techniques, and it adds another dimension of iconic depiction in which sign languages may vary from each other (in addition to the entity/handling handshape distinction). Moreover, the results appear to be areally defined, with the three European languages using this representation technique significantly more often than the three African languages.
六种手语词汇中尺寸描述空间距离的跨语言差异
本文从符号学的角度研究了六种手语词汇符号中一种尺寸描述的分布。最近,越来越多的研究集中在两种表示技术的分布上,即使用实体手型和处理手型来描述手持工具(例如Ortega et al. 2014)。Padden et al.(2013)发现在使用这对表示技术时存在跨语言差异。这项研究着眼于以前没有系统研究过的表示技术的变化,即划分一段空间来描绘一个参考物的大小,或者基于空间的距离来描述大小。它考虑的问题是,使用这种表示技术的跨语言差异是否也受特定语言模式的支配(参见Padden et al. 2013)。本研究量化并比较了六种手语词汇中基于空间距离的大小描述,三种来自西欧,三种来自西非。研究发现,手语在使用这种描述类型的频率上存在显著差异。因此,这一结果证实了表征技术的选择和分布不仅取决于所描绘图像的特征,还取决于表征技术分布中的语言特定模式,并且它增加了符号描述的另一个维度,其中手语可能彼此不同(除了实体/处理手形的区别)。此外,结果似乎是真正明确的,三种欧洲语言使用这种表示技术的频率明显高于三种非洲语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信