Helping Children With Autism Engage in Symbolic Play

Q4 Social Sciences
C. Westby
{"title":"Helping Children With Autism Engage in Symbolic Play","authors":"C. Westby","doi":"10.1177/10483950221075404d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deficiencies in symbolic pretend play are early markers of ASD (Wetherby et al., 2004). Symbolic pretend play behaviors in children with ASD are usually limited, tend to be disconnected and different in form, and lack diversity when compared with the symbolic pretend play of children with typical development. Because symbolic pretend play is linked to language, cognitive, social-emotional, and self-regulation development, early childhood educators and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often work to facilitate children’s development of these play skills. Developing these play skills is particularly difficult for children with ASD. Several single-subject design studies with small numbers of older preschool children with ASD have employed a least-to-most prompting (LTM) protocol to teach symbolic play. These studies have reported some degree of success in increasing the frequency and diversity in the play of the children with ASD (Barton, 2015; Barton & Wolery, 2010; Saral & Ulke-Kurkcuoglu, 2020). LTM consists of at least a three-level prompt hierarchy in which the least intrusive prompt is followed by more intrusive prompts. LTM might be particularly effective for teaching pretend play because it (a) lets the child respond independently, (b) minimizes the possibility of overreliance on prompts, (c) can be embedded into play contexts, and (d) supports an effective interaction between the child and their playmate. In the play sessions, the adults contingently imitated the child and applied a system of from least to most prompts. Saral and Ulke-Kurkcuoglu (2020) reported some success in the use of the LTM method to increase pretend play and symbolic behaviors in children with ASD. SLPs frequently use pretend play as an intervention context and goal. The LTM may be a useful therapeutic method for SLPs when working with children with ASD. Following is the LTM protocol used to promote four types of symbolic pretend play:","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221075404d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deficiencies in symbolic pretend play are early markers of ASD (Wetherby et al., 2004). Symbolic pretend play behaviors in children with ASD are usually limited, tend to be disconnected and different in form, and lack diversity when compared with the symbolic pretend play of children with typical development. Because symbolic pretend play is linked to language, cognitive, social-emotional, and self-regulation development, early childhood educators and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often work to facilitate children’s development of these play skills. Developing these play skills is particularly difficult for children with ASD. Several single-subject design studies with small numbers of older preschool children with ASD have employed a least-to-most prompting (LTM) protocol to teach symbolic play. These studies have reported some degree of success in increasing the frequency and diversity in the play of the children with ASD (Barton, 2015; Barton & Wolery, 2010; Saral & Ulke-Kurkcuoglu, 2020). LTM consists of at least a three-level prompt hierarchy in which the least intrusive prompt is followed by more intrusive prompts. LTM might be particularly effective for teaching pretend play because it (a) lets the child respond independently, (b) minimizes the possibility of overreliance on prompts, (c) can be embedded into play contexts, and (d) supports an effective interaction between the child and their playmate. In the play sessions, the adults contingently imitated the child and applied a system of from least to most prompts. Saral and Ulke-Kurkcuoglu (2020) reported some success in the use of the LTM method to increase pretend play and symbolic behaviors in children with ASD. SLPs frequently use pretend play as an intervention context and goal. The LTM may be a useful therapeutic method for SLPs when working with children with ASD. Following is the LTM protocol used to promote four types of symbolic pretend play:
帮助自闭症儿童参与符号游戏
象征性假装游戏的缺陷是ASD的早期标志(Wetherby等人,2004)。自闭症儿童的象征性假装游戏行为通常是有限的,往往是脱节的,形式不同,与典型发育儿童的象征式假装游戏相比缺乏多样性。由于象征性的假装游戏与语言、认知、社会情感和自我调节的发展有关,幼儿教育工作者和言语语言病理学家(SLP)经常致力于促进儿童发展这些游戏技能。发展这些游戏技能对自闭症谱系障碍儿童来说尤其困难。几项针对少数患有自闭症的学龄前儿童的单学科设计研究采用了最少到最多提示(LTM)方案来教授符号游戏。这些研究报告称,在增加自闭症谱系障碍儿童游戏的频率和多样性方面取得了一定程度的成功(Barton,2015;Barton&Wolery,2010;Saral&Ulke-Kurkcuoglu,2020)。LTM至少由三级提示层次结构组成,其中侵入性最小的提示之后是侵入性更强的提示。LTM在教授假装游戏方面可能特别有效,因为它(a)让孩子独立做出反应,(b)最大限度地减少过度依赖提示的可能性,(c)可以嵌入游戏环境,(d)支持孩子和玩伴之间的有效互动。在游戏环节,成年人会临时模仿孩子,并采用从最少到最多的提示系统。Saral和Ulke-Kurkcuoglu(2020)报道了在使用LTM方法来增加ASD儿童的假装游戏和象征行为方面取得的一些成功。SLP经常使用假装游戏作为干预背景和目标。LTM在治疗ASD儿童时可能是SLP的一种有用的治疗方法。以下是用于促进四种类型的象征性假装游戏的LTM协议:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信