Rethinking capabilities in information security risk management: a systematic literature review

Q3 Decision Sciences
Martin Lundgren
{"title":"Rethinking capabilities in information security risk management: a systematic literature review","authors":"Martin Lundgren","doi":"10.1504/IJRAM.2020.10028870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information security risk management capabilities have predominantly focused on instrumental onsets, while largely ignoring the underlying intentions and knowledge these management practices entail. This article aims to study what capabilities are embedded in information security risk management. A theoretical framework is proposed, namely rethinking capability as the alignment between intent and knowing. The framework is situated around four general risk management practices. A systematic literature review utilising the framework was conducted, resulting in the identification of eight identified capabilities. These capabilities were grouped into respective practices: integrating various perspectives and values to reach a risk perception aligned with the intended outcome (identify); adapting to varying perspectives of risks and prioritising them in accordance with the intended outcome (prioritise); security controls to enable resources, and integrate/reconfigure beliefs held by various stakeholders (implement); and sustaining the integrated resources and competences held by stakeholders to continue the alignment with the intended outcome (monitor).","PeriodicalId":35420,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2020.10028870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Information security risk management capabilities have predominantly focused on instrumental onsets, while largely ignoring the underlying intentions and knowledge these management practices entail. This article aims to study what capabilities are embedded in information security risk management. A theoretical framework is proposed, namely rethinking capability as the alignment between intent and knowing. The framework is situated around four general risk management practices. A systematic literature review utilising the framework was conducted, resulting in the identification of eight identified capabilities. These capabilities were grouped into respective practices: integrating various perspectives and values to reach a risk perception aligned with the intended outcome (identify); adapting to varying perspectives of risks and prioritising them in accordance with the intended outcome (prioritise); security controls to enable resources, and integrate/reconfigure beliefs held by various stakeholders (implement); and sustaining the integrated resources and competences held by stakeholders to continue the alignment with the intended outcome (monitor).
对信息安全风险管理能力的反思:系统文献综述
信息安全风险管理能力主要集中在工具性响应上,而在很大程度上忽略了这些管理实践所包含的潜在意图和知识。本文旨在研究信息安全风险管理中嵌入了哪些功能。提出了一个理论框架,即将能力重新思考为意图与认识的统一。该框架围绕四种一般风险管理做法展开。利用该框架进行了系统的文献综述,确定了八种已确定的能力。这些能力被分为各自的实践:整合各种观点和价值观,以达成与预期结果一致的风险感知(识别);适应不同的风险视角,并根据预期结果对其进行优先排序(优先级);安全控制以启用资源,并整合/重新配置各种利益相关者持有的信念(实施);维持利益攸关方拥有的综合资源和能力,以继续与预期结果保持一致(监测)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The IJRAM is an interdisciplinary and refereed journal that provides cross learning between: - Different business and economics, as well as scientific and technological, disciplines - Energy industries, environmental and ecological systems - Safety, public health and medical services - Software services, reliability and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信