Evaluating survival and quality of life with ambulatory chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

S. Sirilerttrakul, Nopakan Wannakansophon, Patamaporn Tangteerakoon, Suluck Vongterapak, M. Jirajarus, Sineenuch Ckumdee, E. Sirachainan, P. Chansriwong
{"title":"Evaluating survival and quality of life with ambulatory chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.","authors":"S. Sirilerttrakul, Nopakan Wannakansophon, Patamaporn Tangteerakoon, Suluck Vongterapak, M. Jirajarus, Sineenuch Ckumdee, E. Sirachainan, P. Chansriwong","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"10 Background: Colorectal cancer is an important health problems in Thailand. Chemotherapy treatment that was once delivered only in hospital environments is now administered at patient's home that helping patients to live normal lives during receiving chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens are based on a 48 hours 5-fluorouracil infusion combined that need patients to be hospitalized, consequence to decrease QOL and increase cost of treatment. Methods: An observational cohort which enrolled 156 patients at the Ramathibodi hospital from Dec 2015 to Nov 2016. Ambulatory chemotherapy (AC) administered by the central venous access device (CVAD). The regimen as FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, 5-FU were in the elastomeric infusion pump and administered at the patients’ home. The questionnaire of FACT-G and FACT-C scale, cost of treatment were collected at time of enrolment, 2 months and end of treatment. DFS and OS were analyzed in patients who treated with first regimen of metastasis chemotherapy. Nurse coordinator followed up them by phone. Aims: Compares the DFS, OS, QOL score, and cost difference in AC patients compared with inpatient treatment. Results: 156 patients are enrolled that 111 patients treated with AC and 45 patients treated with inpatient. Questionnaire response rate was 86%. Intention to treat analysis revealed significantly improved in social wellbeing and FACT-G (p < 0.001) in AC group. No difference in DFS between AC and inpatient group (12.6 vs 11.9 months, HR 0.82, p = 0.33). Overall survival trended to longer survival in AC arm (2.43 vs 1.83 years, HR 0.78, P = 0.28). The AC reduced cost about 338 US dollars per cycle of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Ambulatory chemotherapy helps colorectal cancer patients to live normal lives by administer treatment at patients' home and results to significantly improve in quality of life . No difference in DFS and OS benefit, but trends in gaining more benefits in ambulatory treatment. Moreover, ambulatory chemotherapy reduced cost of chemotherapy treatment.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

10 Background: Colorectal cancer is an important health problems in Thailand. Chemotherapy treatment that was once delivered only in hospital environments is now administered at patient's home that helping patients to live normal lives during receiving chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens are based on a 48 hours 5-fluorouracil infusion combined that need patients to be hospitalized, consequence to decrease QOL and increase cost of treatment. Methods: An observational cohort which enrolled 156 patients at the Ramathibodi hospital from Dec 2015 to Nov 2016. Ambulatory chemotherapy (AC) administered by the central venous access device (CVAD). The regimen as FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, 5-FU were in the elastomeric infusion pump and administered at the patients’ home. The questionnaire of FACT-G and FACT-C scale, cost of treatment were collected at time of enrolment, 2 months and end of treatment. DFS and OS were analyzed in patients who treated with first regimen of metastasis chemotherapy. Nurse coordinator followed up them by phone. Aims: Compares the DFS, OS, QOL score, and cost difference in AC patients compared with inpatient treatment. Results: 156 patients are enrolled that 111 patients treated with AC and 45 patients treated with inpatient. Questionnaire response rate was 86%. Intention to treat analysis revealed significantly improved in social wellbeing and FACT-G (p < 0.001) in AC group. No difference in DFS between AC and inpatient group (12.6 vs 11.9 months, HR 0.82, p = 0.33). Overall survival trended to longer survival in AC arm (2.43 vs 1.83 years, HR 0.78, P = 0.28). The AC reduced cost about 338 US dollars per cycle of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Ambulatory chemotherapy helps colorectal cancer patients to live normal lives by administer treatment at patients' home and results to significantly improve in quality of life . No difference in DFS and OS benefit, but trends in gaining more benefits in ambulatory treatment. Moreover, ambulatory chemotherapy reduced cost of chemotherapy treatment.
转移性癌症动态化疗的生存率和生活质量评价。
10背景:癌症是泰国一个重要的健康问题。曾经只在医院环境中进行的化疗现在在患者家中进行,帮助患者在接受化疗期间过上正常的生活。化疗方案基于48小时5-氟尿嘧啶联合输注,需要患者住院治疗,从而降低生活质量并增加治疗成本。方法:一个观察性队列,纳入2015年12月至2016年11月在Ramathibodi医院的156名患者。通过中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)进行的动态化疗(AC)。FOLFOX或FOLFIRI,5-FU方案在弹性输液泵中,在患者家中给药。在入组时、2个月和治疗结束时收集FACT-G和FACT-C量表的问卷、治疗费用。分析了接受第一方案转移化疗的患者的DFS和OS。护士协调员通过电话跟进了他们。目的:比较AC患者与住院治疗的DFS、OS、QOL评分和费用差异。结果:156名患者入选,其中111名患者接受AC治疗,45名患者接受住院治疗。问卷回复率为86%。意向治疗分析显示AC组的社会幸福感和FACT-G显著改善(p<0.001)。AC组和住院组的DFS没有差异(12.6个月vs 11.9个月,HR 0.82,p=0.33)。AC组的总生存期趋向于更长的生存期(2.43年vs 1.83年,HR 0.78,p=0.28)。每个化疗周期AC减少了约338美元的费用。结论:动态化疗通过在癌症患者家中进行治疗,有助于患者过上正常的生活,并显著提高患者的生活质量。DFS和OS的益处没有差异,但在门诊治疗中有获得更多益处的趋势。此外,门诊化疗降低了化疗治疗的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信