Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dengan Metode Fuzzy-Service Quality (F-Servqual) dan Index Potential Gain Customer Value (IPGCV)

Wahyu Oktri Widyarto, Nugraheni Djamal, Fauzul Adhim
{"title":"Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dengan Metode Fuzzy-Service Quality (F-Servqual) dan Index Potential Gain Customer Value (IPGCV)","authors":"Wahyu Oktri Widyarto, Nugraheni Djamal, Fauzul Adhim","doi":"10.30656/jsmi.v2i2.769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the level of service quality and prioritize improvements. The method that used in this study is service quality (SERVQUAL) combined with fuzzy concepts to find out the gap between expectations and consumer perceptions through five dimensions namely tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Fuzzy concepts are used to present uncertainties over respondents' assessment of subjective questionnaires. To determine the priority of improvement, used the Customer Value Index Potential Gains (IPGCV) method. Based on processing data results by using fuzzy-servqual method, it is known that the Tangible dimension has a gap of -0.13, the Reliability dimension has a gap of -0.13, the Responsive dimension has a gap of -0.14, the dimension of Assurance has a gap of -0.12, Empathy dimension has a gap of -0.11. The negative value on fuzzy-servqual assessment can be interpreted that the overall service has not met customer expectations. Achievement of the quality level is equal to 0.8606 which is indicates the quality of services still need improvement because the level of service quality is less than 1 (Q <1). Based on calculation using the PGCV Index, it is known that services which have the highest priority are employees who have adequate support from their institutions so that they can carry out their duties properl","PeriodicalId":53057,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v2i2.769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the level of service quality and prioritize improvements. The method that used in this study is service quality (SERVQUAL) combined with fuzzy concepts to find out the gap between expectations and consumer perceptions through five dimensions namely tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Fuzzy concepts are used to present uncertainties over respondents' assessment of subjective questionnaires. To determine the priority of improvement, used the Customer Value Index Potential Gains (IPGCV) method. Based on processing data results by using fuzzy-servqual method, it is known that the Tangible dimension has a gap of -0.13, the Reliability dimension has a gap of -0.13, the Responsive dimension has a gap of -0.14, the dimension of Assurance has a gap of -0.12, Empathy dimension has a gap of -0.11. The negative value on fuzzy-servqual assessment can be interpreted that the overall service has not met customer expectations. Achievement of the quality level is equal to 0.8606 which is indicates the quality of services still need improvement because the level of service quality is less than 1 (Q <1). Based on calculation using the PGCV Index, it is known that services which have the highest priority are employees who have adequate support from their institutions so that they can carry out their duties properl
模糊服务质量(F-Servqual)指标潜在客户价值(IPGCV)分析
本研究旨在分析服务质量水平,并确定改进的优先级。本研究采用的方法是将服务质量(SERVQUAL)与模糊概念相结合,通过有形、可靠性、响应性、保证性和同理心五个维度来找出期望与消费者感知之间的差距。模糊概念被用来表示受访者对主观问卷评估的不确定性。为了确定改进的优先级,使用了客户价值指数潜在收益(IPGCV)方法。基于模糊servqual方法对数据的处理结果,可知有形维度的差距为-0.13,可靠性维度的差距是-0.13,响应维度的间隙是-0.14,保证维度的间隙为-0.12,同理心维度的间距是-0.11。模糊servqual评估的负值可以解释为整体服务没有达到客户的期望。质量水平的实现等于0.8606,这表明服务质量仍然需要改进,因为服务质量水平小于1(Q<1)。根据PGCV指数的计算,已知具有最高优先级的服务是那些得到机构充分支持的员工,以便他们能够顺利履行职责
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信