Effect of Multimodal Intervention on Cancer-Related Fatigue and Quality of Life among Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment—Pilot Study (Part 1)

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shambhavi Shambhavi, D. Lobo
{"title":"Effect of Multimodal Intervention on Cancer-Related Fatigue and Quality of Life among Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment—Pilot Study (Part 1)","authors":"Shambhavi Shambhavi, D. Lobo","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and devastating problem in cancer patients even after successful treatment. CRF has a severe impact on daily activities, social relationships, reintegration, and overall quality of life (QOL). Objective  This study was done to evaluate the effect of multimodal intervention (MMI) on CRF and QOL among cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment. Materials and Methods  One group before-and-after study (pre-experimental design) was conducted among cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment who met inclusion criteria and were selected using a purposive sampling technique, in selected hospitals. MMI consisted of exercise program, acupressure, and home care management guide. Pre-test CRF and QOL were assessed on first day using a FACIT-F scale (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy: Fatigue) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Fatigue (FACT-G) Version 4, respectively. Post- test for CRF was further determined after 7 days, 21 days, and 3months and QOL was determined after 21 days and 3 months. Statistical Analysis  Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented as frequency and percentage. Comparison of pre- test and post-test means of CRF and QOL is done by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlation between fatigue and QOL of cancer patients was found by using Pearson correlation test. Results  The mean pre-test fatigue score of the cancer patients (pre-test mean= 25.21) was lower than their mean post-test fatigue scores (post-test 1 =25.83, post-test 2 = 28.28, and post-test 3 = 34.72). There was a significant difference in CRF and QOL scores between before and after the MMI. In the repeated measures ANOVA, p -value is less than 0.05 (level of significance p  < 0.05). Conclusion  Regardless of mechanism of occurrence of fatigue, most patients living with cancer suffer with persistent CRF. Yet it is often not assessed, has limited treatment options, there is a need to assess the state of fatigue in cancer patients. They do need intervention to reduce the fatigue and to improve the QOL. Nonpharmacological therapies are the best strategies to manage the fatigue among cancer patients without any safety issue.","PeriodicalId":40092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and devastating problem in cancer patients even after successful treatment. CRF has a severe impact on daily activities, social relationships, reintegration, and overall quality of life (QOL). Objective  This study was done to evaluate the effect of multimodal intervention (MMI) on CRF and QOL among cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment. Materials and Methods  One group before-and-after study (pre-experimental design) was conducted among cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment who met inclusion criteria and were selected using a purposive sampling technique, in selected hospitals. MMI consisted of exercise program, acupressure, and home care management guide. Pre-test CRF and QOL were assessed on first day using a FACIT-F scale (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy: Fatigue) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Fatigue (FACT-G) Version 4, respectively. Post- test for CRF was further determined after 7 days, 21 days, and 3months and QOL was determined after 21 days and 3 months. Statistical Analysis  Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented as frequency and percentage. Comparison of pre- test and post-test means of CRF and QOL is done by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlation between fatigue and QOL of cancer patients was found by using Pearson correlation test. Results  The mean pre-test fatigue score of the cancer patients (pre-test mean= 25.21) was lower than their mean post-test fatigue scores (post-test 1 =25.83, post-test 2 = 28.28, and post-test 3 = 34.72). There was a significant difference in CRF and QOL scores between before and after the MMI. In the repeated measures ANOVA, p -value is less than 0.05 (level of significance p  < 0.05). Conclusion  Regardless of mechanism of occurrence of fatigue, most patients living with cancer suffer with persistent CRF. Yet it is often not assessed, has limited treatment options, there is a need to assess the state of fatigue in cancer patients. They do need intervention to reduce the fatigue and to improve the QOL. Nonpharmacological therapies are the best strategies to manage the fatigue among cancer patients without any safety issue.
多模式干预对癌症治疗患者癌症相关疲劳和生活质量的影响——初步研究(上)
摘要背景 癌症相关疲劳(CRF)是癌症患者中最常见和最具破坏性的问题,即使在成功治疗后也是如此。CRF对日常活动、社会关系、重新融入社会和整体生活质量(QOL)有严重影响。客观的 本研究旨在评估多模式干预(MMI)对接受癌症治疗的癌症患者CRF和生活质量的影响。材料和方法 一组研究前后(实验前设计)在接受癌症治疗的癌症患者中进行,这些患者符合入选标准,并在选定的医院使用有目的的抽样技术进行选择。MMI包括锻炼计划、穴位按摩和家庭护理管理指南。试验前CRF和QOL分别在第一天使用FACIT-F量表(慢性疾病治疗功能评估:疲劳)和癌症治疗功能评估(FACT-G)版本4进行评估。CRF试验后在7天、21天和3个月后进一步测定,生活质量在21天和三个月后测定。统计分析 参与者的人口统计学和临床特征以频率和百分比表示。通过重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)对CRF和生活质量的测试前和测试后均值进行比较。应用Pearson相关检验发现癌症患者疲劳与生活质量之间存在相关性。后果 癌症患者的平均测试前疲劳评分(测试前平均值=25.21)低于他们的平均测试后疲劳评分(试验后1=25.83,试验后2 = 28.28和测试后3 = 术前和术后CRF和QOL评分有显著性差异。在重复测量方差分析中,p值小于0.05(显著性水平p < 0.05)。结论 无论疲劳的发生机制如何,大多数癌症患者都患有持续性CRF。然而,它往往没有得到评估,治疗选择有限,有必要评估癌症患者的疲劳状态。他们确实需要干预来减少疲劳并提高生活质量。在没有任何安全问题的情况下,非药物疗法是治疗癌症患者疲劳的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信