Preliminary Clinical Outcomes From The Polyetheretherketone On Ceramic Simplify™ Disc FDA IDE Trial

G. Maislin, D. Maislin, B. Keenan, A. Mr.
{"title":"Preliminary Clinical Outcomes From The Polyetheretherketone On Ceramic Simplify™ Disc FDA IDE Trial","authors":"G. Maislin, D. Maislin, B. Keenan, A. Mr.","doi":"10.4172/2325-9701.1000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was performed to evaluate the preliminary clinical results for the Simplify™ Cervical Artificial Disc. Methods: We compared outcomes for the first 61 subjects to reach Month 12 follow-up in a prospective, multicenter, FDA IDE clinical trial with 61 propensity score matched historical control subjects who received conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. The outcome measures included the change from preoperative baseline to Month 12 in Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain with missing follow-up determined by last observation carried forward. Results: The null hypothesis that the Simplify 1-disc is inferior to ACDF (non-inferiority margin=8.4) was rejected at a 1-sided p<0.0001. The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% non-inferiority confidence interval was -7.44 which is much smaller than the non-inferiority margin of 8.4. Superiority was demonstrated with a 2-sided p=0.0004. The upper bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval was -6.26 which is much less than zero. Sensitivity analyses on the assumptions about missing data and the matching included completer’s analyses and analyses that were restricted to the 55 of 61 first stage matches that could be achieved without expanding of the calipers used to identify potential matches. The p-values for non-inferiority in all analyses are <0.0001. Similarly, the p-values for superiority are all ≤ 0.0030. Conclusion: Therefore, we conclude that the Simplify Disc is superior to ACDF control in terms of improvement in NDI and VAS from baseline to Month 12.","PeriodicalId":90240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","volume":"2018 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: This study was performed to evaluate the preliminary clinical results for the Simplify™ Cervical Artificial Disc. Methods: We compared outcomes for the first 61 subjects to reach Month 12 follow-up in a prospective, multicenter, FDA IDE clinical trial with 61 propensity score matched historical control subjects who received conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. The outcome measures included the change from preoperative baseline to Month 12 in Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain with missing follow-up determined by last observation carried forward. Results: The null hypothesis that the Simplify 1-disc is inferior to ACDF (non-inferiority margin=8.4) was rejected at a 1-sided p<0.0001. The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% non-inferiority confidence interval was -7.44 which is much smaller than the non-inferiority margin of 8.4. Superiority was demonstrated with a 2-sided p=0.0004. The upper bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval was -6.26 which is much less than zero. Sensitivity analyses on the assumptions about missing data and the matching included completer’s analyses and analyses that were restricted to the 55 of 61 first stage matches that could be achieved without expanding of the calipers used to identify potential matches. The p-values for non-inferiority in all analyses are <0.0001. Similarly, the p-values for superiority are all ≤ 0.0030. Conclusion: Therefore, we conclude that the Simplify Disc is superior to ACDF control in terms of improvement in NDI and VAS from baseline to Month 12.
聚醚醚酮在陶瓷上的初步临床效果™ 美国食品药品监督管理局椎间盘IDE试验
背景:本研究旨在评估Simplify的初步临床结果™ 颈椎人工椎间盘。方法:在一项前瞻性、多中心、美国食品药品监督管理局IDE临床试验中,我们比较了前61名随访至第12个月的受试者的结果,其中61名受试者接受了常规颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗单级颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病,其倾向评分与历史对照受试者相匹配。结果测量包括从术前基线到第12个月颈部残疾指数(NDI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的变化,颈部和手臂疼痛由最后一次随访确定。结果:Simplify 1-disc劣于ACDF的零假设(非劣效性界限=8.4)在单侧p<0.0001时被拒绝。单侧95%非劣效性置信区间的上限为-7.44,远小于8.4的非劣效边际。优势表现为双侧p=0.0004。双侧95%置信区间的上限为-6.26,远小于零。对缺失数据和匹配假设的敏感性分析包括完成者的分析和分析,这些分析仅限于61场第一阶段比赛中的55场,而无需扩展用于识别潜在匹配的卡尺即可实现。所有分析中非劣效性的p值均<0.0001。同样,优越性的p值均≤0.0030。结论:因此,我们得出结论,从基线到第12个月,Simplify Disc在NDI和VAS方面的改善优于ACDF对照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信