Pondering the “psychogenic pain”: Proposal for using the term “cognitively perceived pain”

Pain Research Pub Date : 2018-09-15 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.33.183
T. Ushida, K. Noguchi, T. Hosokawa, T. Taguchi, Kazuhisa Takahashi, M. Sumitani, S. Kikuchi
{"title":"Pondering the “psychogenic pain”: Proposal for using the term “cognitively perceived pain”","authors":"T. Ushida, K. Noguchi, T. Hosokawa, T. Taguchi, Kazuhisa Takahashi, M. Sumitani, S. Kikuchi","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.33.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic pain is one of the common health problems among the general popula-tion. Various mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of pain, and a correct understanding of its pathophysiology or cause is important for an optimal manage-ment of pain. In terms of the physiological anatomy, pain with physical ⁄ organic causes can be classified mainly as “nociceptive pain” or “neuropathic pain.” However, there is also pain that does not fall into either of these two categories. This type of pain is often considered as a third classification, but its definition has not been standardized globally. In Japan, this type of pain is often called “psychogenic pain,” even when the pain is not attributed to psychological factors. However, it may not be an appropriate term for this particular type of pain. Firstly, because there is no standardized definition, physicians differ in how they classify pain as “psy-chogenic.” Additionally, the term “psychogenic” could give negative impressions to patients, which can deteriorate the patient–physician relationship and may result in poor treatment outcomes. In this paper, we have discussed these problems and proposed a new term “cognitively perceived pain” for this third category of pain, with the aim to foster a more appropriate, and easy–to–understand classification of pain. “Cognitively perceived pain” encompasses all pain that is neither nociceptive nor neuropathic pain, including that described as centralized pain or sensory hypersensitivity, in addition to psychogenic pain according to its original meaning (i.e.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.33.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain is one of the common health problems among the general popula-tion. Various mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of pain, and a correct understanding of its pathophysiology or cause is important for an optimal manage-ment of pain. In terms of the physiological anatomy, pain with physical ⁄ organic causes can be classified mainly as “nociceptive pain” or “neuropathic pain.” However, there is also pain that does not fall into either of these two categories. This type of pain is often considered as a third classification, but its definition has not been standardized globally. In Japan, this type of pain is often called “psychogenic pain,” even when the pain is not attributed to psychological factors. However, it may not be an appropriate term for this particular type of pain. Firstly, because there is no standardized definition, physicians differ in how they classify pain as “psy-chogenic.” Additionally, the term “psychogenic” could give negative impressions to patients, which can deteriorate the patient–physician relationship and may result in poor treatment outcomes. In this paper, we have discussed these problems and proposed a new term “cognitively perceived pain” for this third category of pain, with the aim to foster a more appropriate, and easy–to–understand classification of pain. “Cognitively perceived pain” encompasses all pain that is neither nociceptive nor neuropathic pain, including that described as centralized pain or sensory hypersensitivity, in addition to psychogenic pain according to its original meaning (i.e.
对“心因性疼痛”的思考:使用“认知感知疼痛”一词的建议
慢性疼痛是普通人群中常见的健康问题之一。疼痛的病理生理涉及多种机制,正确理解疼痛的病理生理或病因对疼痛的最佳治疗非常重要。从生理解剖学的角度来看,由物理或器质性原因引起的疼痛主要可分为“伤害性疼痛”或“神经性疼痛”。然而,也有不属于这两类的痛苦。这种类型的疼痛通常被认为是第三种分类,但其定义尚未在全球范围内标准化。在日本,这种类型的疼痛通常被称为“心因性疼痛”,即使这种疼痛不是由心理因素引起的。然而,对于这种特殊类型的疼痛,它可能不是一个合适的术语。首先,由于没有标准化的定义,医生在如何将疼痛归类为“心因性”方面存在分歧。此外,“心因性”一词可能给患者留下负面印象,从而恶化医患关系,并可能导致治疗效果不佳。在本文中,我们讨论了这些问题,并为第三类疼痛提出了一个新的术语“认知感知疼痛”,目的是培养一个更合适、更容易理解的疼痛分类。“认知感知的疼痛”包括所有既非伤害性疼痛也非神经性疼痛,包括被描述为集中疼痛或感觉超敏反应的疼痛,以及根据其原意(即神经性疼痛)的心因性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信