Improving Upland Acid Soil Properties And Increasing Maize Yield By Phosphate Rock Application With Organic Acids

IF 1.5 Q2 AGRONOMY
M. T. Sutriadi, Syaiful Anwar, B. Mulyanto, Darmawan, Husnain, A. Jaya
{"title":"Improving Upland Acid Soil Properties And Increasing Maize Yield By Phosphate Rock Application With Organic Acids","authors":"M. T. Sutriadi, Syaiful Anwar, B. Mulyanto, Darmawan, Husnain, A. Jaya","doi":"10.1155/2022/9720632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems encountered in the management of upland acid soils, besides soil pH, are also low in phosphorus (P) content and less available to plants. The addition of organic acids (OAs) to the direct application of phosphate rock (PR) has not been widely studied yet and is expected to improve upland acid soil properties. The research aims to determine the effect of adding OAs on the direct application of PR to improve upland acid soil and increase maize yield. It was a greenhouse experiment using a randomized complete design in a factorial arrangement with three replications. The treatments consisted of four types of OA (citric, humic, succinic, and oxalic acid) and five OA concentration levels (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 ppm). The hybrid maize (Zea mays L) was used as the test crop. The parameters observed were soil properties (pH, exchangeable H (H+), exchangeable Al (Al3+), exchangeable Ca (Ca2+), cation exchange capacity (CEC), available P (as P-Bray1)) and maize growth (plant heights and yield). The results show that the types of OA treatments had no significant effect on soil properties and maize yield; in contrast, the concentrations of OA levels were able to improve soil properties as indicated by a significant effect on pH, H+, Al3+, Ca2+, CEC, available P, and increased maize yield. An increase in soil pH due to the addition of OAs to the direct application of PR could increase Ca2+ and CEC and decrease Al3+ and H+, while increasing available P for plants. Although not significantly different, oxalic acid was able to improve the observed soil properties and maize yield, followed by citric, humic, and succinic acids. The maximum OA concentration was 126.9 ppm. We can say that the main finding of this research is that oxalic, citric, humic, and succinic acids at a concentration of 126 ppm can be applied to phosphate rock. In Indonesia, humic acid has been widely applied by farmers because it is easy to obtain. Therefore, it can be applied to phosphate rock.","PeriodicalId":13844,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agronomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9720632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problems encountered in the management of upland acid soils, besides soil pH, are also low in phosphorus (P) content and less available to plants. The addition of organic acids (OAs) to the direct application of phosphate rock (PR) has not been widely studied yet and is expected to improve upland acid soil properties. The research aims to determine the effect of adding OAs on the direct application of PR to improve upland acid soil and increase maize yield. It was a greenhouse experiment using a randomized complete design in a factorial arrangement with three replications. The treatments consisted of four types of OA (citric, humic, succinic, and oxalic acid) and five OA concentration levels (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 ppm). The hybrid maize (Zea mays L) was used as the test crop. The parameters observed were soil properties (pH, exchangeable H (H+), exchangeable Al (Al3+), exchangeable Ca (Ca2+), cation exchange capacity (CEC), available P (as P-Bray1)) and maize growth (plant heights and yield). The results show that the types of OA treatments had no significant effect on soil properties and maize yield; in contrast, the concentrations of OA levels were able to improve soil properties as indicated by a significant effect on pH, H+, Al3+, Ca2+, CEC, available P, and increased maize yield. An increase in soil pH due to the addition of OAs to the direct application of PR could increase Ca2+ and CEC and decrease Al3+ and H+, while increasing available P for plants. Although not significantly different, oxalic acid was able to improve the observed soil properties and maize yield, followed by citric, humic, and succinic acids. The maximum OA concentration was 126.9 ppm. We can say that the main finding of this research is that oxalic, citric, humic, and succinic acids at a concentration of 126 ppm can be applied to phosphate rock. In Indonesia, humic acid has been widely applied by farmers because it is easy to obtain. Therefore, it can be applied to phosphate rock.
磷矿施有机酸改善旱地酸性土壤性质提高玉米产量
旱地酸性土壤管理中遇到的问题,除了土壤pH值外,还有磷(P)含量低和植物可利用性差。在磷矿直接施用中添加有机酸尚未得到广泛的研究,有望改善旱地酸性土壤的性质。本研究旨在确定添加OAs对直接施用PR改良旱地酸性土壤、提高玉米产量的影响。这是一个温室试验,采用随机完全设计,阶乘安排,有三个重复。处理包括四种类型的OA(柠檬酸、腐殖酸、琥珀酸和草酸)和五种浓度水平的OA(0、25、50、100和200 ppm)。以杂交玉米(Zea mays L)为试验作物。观测的参数包括土壤性质(pH、交换性H (H+)、交换性Al (Al3+)、交换性Ca (Ca2+)、阳离子交换容量(CEC)、有效磷(P- bray1))和玉米生长(株高和产量)。结果表明:不同类型的OA处理对土壤性质和玉米产量无显著影响;相反,OA水平对土壤的pH、H+、Al3+、Ca2+、CEC、速效磷和玉米产量都有显著的影响,可以改善土壤的性质。直接施用PR增加OAs导致土壤pH升高,增加Ca2+和CEC,降低Al3+和H+,增加植物有效磷。草酸对土壤性状和玉米产量的改善作用不显著,其次是柠檬酸、腐植酸和琥珀酸。最大OA浓度为126.9 ppm。可以说,本研究的主要发现是草酸、柠檬酸、腐植酸和琥珀酸在126ppm浓度下可以应用于磷矿。在印度尼西亚,腐植酸因容易获得而被农民广泛使用。因此,它可以应用于磷矿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信