{"title":"Accuracy of an Apparatus for Measuring Glenoid Baseplate Micromotion in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty","authors":"L. Torkan, J. T. Bryant, R. Bicknell, H. Ploeg","doi":"10.1115/1.4055063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is used to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy. Loosening remains one of the principal modes of implant failure and the main complication leading to revision. Excess micromotion contributes to glenoid loosening. This study assessed the predictive accuracy of an experimental system designed to assess factors contributing to RSA glenoid baseplate micromotion. A half-fractional factorial experiment was designed to assess 4 factors: central element type (screw vs. peg), central element length (13.5 vs. 23.5 mm), anterior posterior peripheral screw type (locking vs. nonlocking) and cancellous bone density (10 vs. 25 pounds per cubic foot [pcf]). Four linear variable differential transducers (LVDTs) recorded micromotion from a stainless-steel disc surrounding a modified glenosphere. The displacements were used to interpolate micromotion at each of the respective peripheral screw positions. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used to determine the predictive accuracy and error range of the system. The MAPE for each condition ranged from 6.8% to 12.9% for an overall MAPE of (9.5±0.9)%. The system had an error range of 2.7 µm to 20.1 µm, which was lower than those reported by prior studies using optical systems. One of the eight conditions had micromotion that exceeded 150 µm. These findings support the use of displacement transducers, specifically LVDTs, as an accurate system for determining RSA baseplate micromotion in rigid polyurethane foam bone surrogates.","PeriodicalId":49305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Devices-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Devices-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is used to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy. Loosening remains one of the principal modes of implant failure and the main complication leading to revision. Excess micromotion contributes to glenoid loosening. This study assessed the predictive accuracy of an experimental system designed to assess factors contributing to RSA glenoid baseplate micromotion. A half-fractional factorial experiment was designed to assess 4 factors: central element type (screw vs. peg), central element length (13.5 vs. 23.5 mm), anterior posterior peripheral screw type (locking vs. nonlocking) and cancellous bone density (10 vs. 25 pounds per cubic foot [pcf]). Four linear variable differential transducers (LVDTs) recorded micromotion from a stainless-steel disc surrounding a modified glenosphere. The displacements were used to interpolate micromotion at each of the respective peripheral screw positions. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used to determine the predictive accuracy and error range of the system. The MAPE for each condition ranged from 6.8% to 12.9% for an overall MAPE of (9.5±0.9)%. The system had an error range of 2.7 µm to 20.1 µm, which was lower than those reported by prior studies using optical systems. One of the eight conditions had micromotion that exceeded 150 µm. These findings support the use of displacement transducers, specifically LVDTs, as an accurate system for determining RSA baseplate micromotion in rigid polyurethane foam bone surrogates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Devices presents papers on medical devices that improve diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic treatments focusing on applied research and the development of new medical devices or instrumentation. It provides special coverage of novel devices that allow new surgical strategies, new methods of drug delivery, or possible reductions in the complexity, cost, or adverse results of health care. The Design Innovation category features papers focusing on novel devices, including papers with limited clinical or engineering results. The Medical Device News section provides coverage of advances, trends, and events.