Numinous Edifices

{"title":"Numinous Edifices","authors":"","doi":"10.51619/stk.v99i1.25074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I explore the experience of the sacred with a focus on how it is experienced through spatial categories, particularly buildings. My main aim is to show how this is an aesthetic experience in the sense of what is intuitively given through our senses. My perspective is phenomenological in that I am above all concerned with how the sacred is experienced, not with how it should be interpreted. Thus, I discuss some of the classic writers on the phenomenology of religion – Mircea Eliade and Rudolf Otto – as well as some of their critics – Jonathan Z. Smith and, indirectly, Erika Fischer-Lichte. In their respective contributions to our understanding of how the sacred manifests itself in spatial edifices, I find both the classics and their critics constructive but ultimately wanting: while the classic approaches emphasize the power of the sacred and its verticality, the critics' responses stress the performance of the sacred and its horizontality. My own contribution consists of a dialectic combination of the two: that the sacred is in some sense construed through the iterations of its performance does not exclude a sacred power that manifests itself through this very performance as a surplus. I conclude that there is a need for a phenomenology of numinous edifices that attends more concretely both to the actual materiality of the buildings in question, as this gives rise to different experiences of the sacred, as well as to the articulation and nuances of a multisensory experience of such buildings.","PeriodicalId":38534,"journal":{"name":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51619/stk.v99i1.25074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I explore the experience of the sacred with a focus on how it is experienced through spatial categories, particularly buildings. My main aim is to show how this is an aesthetic experience in the sense of what is intuitively given through our senses. My perspective is phenomenological in that I am above all concerned with how the sacred is experienced, not with how it should be interpreted. Thus, I discuss some of the classic writers on the phenomenology of religion – Mircea Eliade and Rudolf Otto – as well as some of their critics – Jonathan Z. Smith and, indirectly, Erika Fischer-Lichte. In their respective contributions to our understanding of how the sacred manifests itself in spatial edifices, I find both the classics and their critics constructive but ultimately wanting: while the classic approaches emphasize the power of the sacred and its verticality, the critics' responses stress the performance of the sacred and its horizontality. My own contribution consists of a dialectic combination of the two: that the sacred is in some sense construed through the iterations of its performance does not exclude a sacred power that manifests itself through this very performance as a surplus. I conclude that there is a need for a phenomenology of numinous edifices that attends more concretely both to the actual materiality of the buildings in question, as this gives rise to different experiences of the sacred, as well as to the articulation and nuances of a multisensory experience of such buildings.
庄严的建筑
在这篇文章中,我探索了神圣的体验,重点是如何通过空间类别,特别是建筑来体验它。我的主要目的是展示这是一种审美体验,通过我们的感官直观地给予。我的观点是现象学的,因为我首先关心的是如何体验神圣,而不是如何解释它。因此,我讨论了一些关于宗教现象学的经典作家——米尔恰·埃利亚德和鲁道夫·奥托——以及他们的一些批评者——乔纳森·z·史密斯和埃里卡·费舍尔-利希特。在他们各自对我们理解神圣如何在空间大厦中表现出来的贡献中,我发现经典和他们的批评者都是建设性的,但最终还是缺乏:虽然经典的方法强调神圣的力量和它的垂直性,但评论家的回应强调神圣的表现和它的水平性。我自己的贡献包括两者的辩证结合:在某种意义上,神圣是通过其表演的迭代来解释的,并不排除神圣的力量,这种力量通过这种表演作为盈余表现出来。我的结论是,有必要对灵性建筑进行现象学研究,更具体地关注所讨论的建筑的实际物质性,因为这引起了对神圣的不同体验,以及对这些建筑的多感官体验的表达和细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信