Aesthetic heuristics for design: perceptual and absolute standards of beauty determinants

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Kepes Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.17151/kepes.2022.19.26.3
Stefany Ruiz Córdoba, J. Maya
{"title":"Aesthetic heuristics for design: perceptual and absolute standards of beauty determinants","authors":"Stefany Ruiz Córdoba, J. Maya","doi":"10.17151/kepes.2022.19.26.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extraction and formalization of design heuristics used in design is an increasingly important area of research because of their multiple possibilities of application, especially for design practitioners. However, most of the attention has been paid to design heuristics for designing the product's functionality, usability, or architecture, three design tasks where plenty of methods are already successfully used. On the contrary, aesthetic design is an area where intuition is the prevalent method used to seek the generation of aesthetic pleasure for the user. Some methods exist but they are rather of descriptive nature, stating what to do, but without explaining how to do it. To tackle this problem, this paper describes a method to extract and validate a set of 223aesthetic design heuristics obtained from textbooks and scientific literature. These heuristics were validated through the analysis of 50 products winners of design awards; 123 were coincident and 36 new. Out of the 123, 46 heuristics were randomly selected and validated by analyzing the interrater agreement of an experts' survey (n=24). Eighteen aesthetic design heuristics resulted in potentially increasing the users' aesthetic pleasure.","PeriodicalId":53505,"journal":{"name":"Kepes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kepes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2022.19.26.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extraction and formalization of design heuristics used in design is an increasingly important area of research because of their multiple possibilities of application, especially for design practitioners. However, most of the attention has been paid to design heuristics for designing the product's functionality, usability, or architecture, three design tasks where plenty of methods are already successfully used. On the contrary, aesthetic design is an area where intuition is the prevalent method used to seek the generation of aesthetic pleasure for the user. Some methods exist but they are rather of descriptive nature, stating what to do, but without explaining how to do it. To tackle this problem, this paper describes a method to extract and validate a set of 223aesthetic design heuristics obtained from textbooks and scientific literature. These heuristics were validated through the analysis of 50 products winners of design awards; 123 were coincident and 36 new. Out of the 123, 46 heuristics were randomly selected and validated by analyzing the interrater agreement of an experts' survey (n=24). Eighteen aesthetic design heuristics resulted in potentially increasing the users' aesthetic pleasure.
设计的审美启发式:审美决定因素的感性和绝对标准
设计启发式的提取和形式化是一个越来越重要的研究领域,因为它们有多种应用的可能性,特别是对设计从业者来说。然而,大多数注意力都集中在设计产品的功能、可用性或架构的启发式设计上,这三个设计任务已经成功地使用了大量方法。相反,审美设计是一个以直觉为普遍方法,为用户寻求审美愉悦的领域。有些方法是存在的,但它们是描述性的,说明要做什么,但不解释如何做。为了解决这一问题,本文描述了一种从教科书和科学文献中提取和验证223条美学设计启发式的方法。通过对50个设计奖获奖产品的分析,验证了这些启发式方法;123个是巧合,36个是新的。在123个启发式中,随机选择46个启发式,并通过分析专家调查的相互一致性来验证(n=24)。18种美学设计启发法可能会增加用户的审美愉悦感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kepes
Kepes Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信