Discussion on ‘A knowledge database of hanging-wall traps that are dependent on fault-rock seal’, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-157
{"title":"Discussion on ‘A knowledge database of hanging-wall traps that are dependent on fault-rock seal’, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-157","authors":"W. Power, T. Murray","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2020-081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This discussion responds to the paper by Bretan et al. (2020), specifically mentioning two issues. The first has to do with open science and the accessibility of datasets so that other scientists and the public can test and re-evaluate the work done by others. The second issue we raise concerns a specific conclusion presented in the paper, namely the implied assertion that fault-rock seal is the only explanation for observed pressure differentials between two nearby wells in the Oseberg Sør Field (Norwegian North Sea). The paper by Bretan et al. (2020) tabulates thirty-eight hanging wall hydrocarbon accumulations which the authors stated are dependent on some form of fault seal. The locations and a limited amount of supporting data for seventeen of the thirty-eight accumulations are available, but the data that are available are insufficient in most cases to allow for the analysis and conclusions to be verified independently. We acknowledge that in some cases, it is impossible to publish all the data that were used because of confidentiality restrictions. However, many important data that are easy to publish are not available, and we wish to call for a more widespread release of key data when possible. The Oseberg Sør Field is the only case study from the ‘knowledge database’ that is presented with sufficient data to allow an attempt at replication of the paper’s premises. This discussion summarizes attempts to replicate the conclusions for the Oseberg Sør Field and presents some concerns with the inclusion of this field in the table of fault seal cases. The analysis of Oseberg Sør that is presented elaborates on Fristad et al. (1997) and Yielding et al. (1997). The data in these papers are summarized in Table 1. The most notable addition from Bretan et al. (2020) is a structure contour map. A conclusion of these three papers is that a fault-rock seal on Fault-1 supports a pressure differential of 7.2 bars (refer to the map in Bretan et al. (2020) for the location of Fault-1).","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2020-081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This discussion responds to the paper by Bretan et al. (2020), specifically mentioning two issues. The first has to do with open science and the accessibility of datasets so that other scientists and the public can test and re-evaluate the work done by others. The second issue we raise concerns a specific conclusion presented in the paper, namely the implied assertion that fault-rock seal is the only explanation for observed pressure differentials between two nearby wells in the Oseberg Sør Field (Norwegian North Sea). The paper by Bretan et al. (2020) tabulates thirty-eight hanging wall hydrocarbon accumulations which the authors stated are dependent on some form of fault seal. The locations and a limited amount of supporting data for seventeen of the thirty-eight accumulations are available, but the data that are available are insufficient in most cases to allow for the analysis and conclusions to be verified independently. We acknowledge that in some cases, it is impossible to publish all the data that were used because of confidentiality restrictions. However, many important data that are easy to publish are not available, and we wish to call for a more widespread release of key data when possible. The Oseberg Sør Field is the only case study from the ‘knowledge database’ that is presented with sufficient data to allow an attempt at replication of the paper’s premises. This discussion summarizes attempts to replicate the conclusions for the Oseberg Sør Field and presents some concerns with the inclusion of this field in the table of fault seal cases. The analysis of Oseberg Sør that is presented elaborates on Fristad et al. (1997) and Yielding et al. (1997). The data in these papers are summarized in Table 1. The most notable addition from Bretan et al. (2020) is a structure contour map. A conclusion of these three papers is that a fault-rock seal on Fault-1 supports a pressure differential of 7.2 bars (refer to the map in Bretan et al. (2020) for the location of Fault-1).
这个讨论回应了Bretan et al.(2020)的论文,特别提到了两个问题。第一个与开放科学和数据集的可访问性有关,这样其他科学家和公众就可以测试和重新评估其他人的工作。我们提出的第二个问题与论文中提出的一个具体结论有关,即暗示断层岩密封是Oseberg Sør油田(挪威北海)附近两口井之间观察到的压力差的唯一解释。Bretan等人(2020)的论文列出了38个上盘油气聚集,作者认为这些油气聚集依赖于某种形式的断层封闭性。38个积累点中有17个的地点和数量有限的支持数据是可用的,但在大多数情况下,可用的数据不足以使分析和结论得到独立核实。我们承认,在某些情况下,由于保密限制,不可能公布所使用的所有数据。然而,许多容易发布的重要数据无法获得,我们希望呼吁在可能的情况下更广泛地发布关键数据。Oseberg Sør油田是“知识数据库”中唯一一个具有足够数据的案例研究,可以尝试复制本文的前提。本文总结了在Oseberg Sør油田复制上述结论的尝试,并提出了将该油田纳入断层封闭性案例表的一些问题。所提出的Oseberg Sør的分析详细阐述了Fristad等人(1997)和yield等人(1997)。这些论文的数据汇总在表1中。Bretan等人(2020)最值得注意的补充是结构等高线图。这三篇论文的结论是,1号断层上的断层岩密封支撑着7.2巴的压差(关于1号断层的位置,请参阅Bretan et al.(2020)的地图)。
期刊介绍:
Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE).
Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership.
Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.