States of failure? Ungovernance and the project of state-building in Palestine under the Oslo regime*

Q2 Social Sciences

Transnational Legal Theory Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/20414005.2020.1824482

M. Burgis-Kasthala

引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT How can we understand the relationship between Palestinians and Israelis in the wake of the Oslo regime and to what extent has it facilitated the realisation of Palestinian statehood? Rather than read the Oslo regime as a prelude towards peace and resolution, instead, it has been productive of failure. In understanding how this came to pass and how this state of failure persists, the article argues that ungovernance is an instructive approach, which highlights how Israeli control is achieved through a series of disruptions: severing people from the land, severing rule from responsibility and severing statehood from self-government. After discussing the shape of the Oslo regime, this article explores how ungovernance is practiced across the Palestinian territories through the misgovernance of micro practices that produce a population in disorientation and despair.

查看原文本刊更多论文

失败的状态？奥斯陆政权下的巴勒斯坦治理与建国工程*

摘要我们如何理解奥斯陆政权之后巴勒斯坦人和以色列人之间的关系，以及它在多大程度上促进了巴勒斯坦建国？相反，它并没有把奥斯陆政权解读为和平与解决的前奏，而是失败了。在理解这是如何发生的以及这种失败状态是如何持续的过程中，文章认为，不治理是一种有指导意义的方法，它强调了以色列是如何通过一系列破坏来实现控制的：将人民与土地隔绝，将统治与责任隔绝，将国家与自治隔绝。在讨论了奥斯陆政权的形态后，本文探讨了巴勒斯坦领土上是如何通过微观实践的管理不善来实施无人管理的，这些微观实践导致人们迷失方向和绝望。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Transnational Legal Theory Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.