Essential food and nutrition knowledge and skills for primary school children: Australian parents' opinions

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
G. Aydin, C. Margerison, A. Worsley, A. Booth
{"title":"Essential food and nutrition knowledge and skills for primary school children: Australian parents' opinions","authors":"G. Aydin, C. Margerison, A. Worsley, A. Booth","doi":"10.1108/he-09-2021-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper examines the views of Australian primary school parents regarding the food and nutrition education (FNE) curriculum. Associations with personal values (Universalism and Hedonism) and demographic measures were also explored.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted among 787 parents in March 2021. Parents rated the importance of 17 FNE topics. They were also asked about their support for six curriculum improvements and to state their own improvement suggestions.FindingsParents viewed the “Effect of food on health” and “Food hygiene” as the most important topics. Three FNE components were derived: (1) food safety and preparation, (2) health and nutrition information, (3) food origins and environmental sustainability. The “Food safety and preparation” component score was associated with both universalism-nature and hedonism values but negatively associated with parental education. The “Health and nutrition information” component score was associated with universalism-nature value and main language spoken at home. Lastly, the “Food origins and environmental sustainability” component score was associated with universalism-nature value. The two personal values, universalism-nature and hedonism, were more strongly associated with parents' views of curriculum topics than parental demographic characteristics. Parents had several criticisms of current FNE, including school food environments not resonating with FNE taught in the classroom and that FNE might increase the risk of eating disorders. They also suggested that the FNE curriculum should support both parents and teachers by providing relevant resources and training.Originality/valueAustralian parents' views of the importance of FNE topics and how to improve FNE in primary schools have been under-examined.","PeriodicalId":47067,"journal":{"name":"Health Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/he-09-2021-0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThis paper examines the views of Australian primary school parents regarding the food and nutrition education (FNE) curriculum. Associations with personal values (Universalism and Hedonism) and demographic measures were also explored.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted among 787 parents in March 2021. Parents rated the importance of 17 FNE topics. They were also asked about their support for six curriculum improvements and to state their own improvement suggestions.FindingsParents viewed the “Effect of food on health” and “Food hygiene” as the most important topics. Three FNE components were derived: (1) food safety and preparation, (2) health and nutrition information, (3) food origins and environmental sustainability. The “Food safety and preparation” component score was associated with both universalism-nature and hedonism values but negatively associated with parental education. The “Health and nutrition information” component score was associated with universalism-nature value and main language spoken at home. Lastly, the “Food origins and environmental sustainability” component score was associated with universalism-nature value. The two personal values, universalism-nature and hedonism, were more strongly associated with parents' views of curriculum topics than parental demographic characteristics. Parents had several criticisms of current FNE, including school food environments not resonating with FNE taught in the classroom and that FNE might increase the risk of eating disorders. They also suggested that the FNE curriculum should support both parents and teachers by providing relevant resources and training.Originality/valueAustralian parents' views of the importance of FNE topics and how to improve FNE in primary schools have been under-examined.
小学生必备的食物和营养知识与技能:澳大利亚家长的意见
目的探讨澳大利亚小学家长对食品与营养教育(FNE)课程的看法。还探讨了与个人价值观(普遍主义和享乐主义)和人口统计指标的关系。设计/方法/方法2021年3月,对787名家长进行了一项在线调查。家长们对17个FNE主题的重要性进行了评分。他们还被问及对六项课程改进的支持,并提出了自己的改进建议。家长们认为“食物对健康的影响”和“食物卫生”是最重要的话题。得出了三个FNE组成部分:(1)食品安全和准备,(2)健康和营养信息,(3)食品来源和环境可持续性。“食品安全和准备”成分得分与普遍主义性质和享乐主义价值观相关,但与父母教育呈负相关。“健康和营养信息”成分得分与普遍主义自然价值观和家庭主要语言有关。最后,“食物来源和环境可持续性”成分得分与普遍主义自然价值相关。普遍主义本质和享乐主义这两种个人价值观与父母对课程主题的看法比父母的人口特征更紧密地联系在一起。家长们对目前的FNE有一些批评,包括学校的饮食环境与课堂上教授的FNE不一致,以及FNE可能会增加饮食失调的风险。他们还建议,FNE课程应通过提供相关资源和培训来支持家长和教师。原创性/价值观澳大利亚家长对FNE主题的重要性以及如何在小学提高FNE的看法一直在接受审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education
Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The range of topics covered is necessarily extremely wide. Recent examples include: ■Sex and sexuality ■Mental health ■Occupational health education ■Health communication ■The arts and health ■Personal change ■Healthy eating ■User involvement ■Drug and tobacco education ■Ethical issues in health education ■Developing the evidence base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信