{"title":"Application of vector flow mapping technique in the assessment of left intraventricular pressure gradients in heart failure patients","authors":"Yao Xu, Mengmeng Li, Mingjun Xu, Yun Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the changes of intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs) and intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPGs) in different phases of cardiac cycle in patients with heart failure(HF) patients by relative pressure imaging based on vector flow imaging(VFM). \n \n \nMethods \nForty-nine HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 0.50 hospitalized in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from November 2018 to January 2019, including thirty-three patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF group) and fifteen patients with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF group), and forty-three controls were enrolled in this study. Clinical data and echocardiographic images were collected and the conventional left ventricular diameter, mass, volume, and systolic and diastolic function parameters were measured. IVPDs and IVPGs during isovolemic systole (IC), rapid ejection (RE), isovolemic diastole (IR), rapid filling (RF) and atrial systole (AC) phases were obtained by the VFM technique. The changes of IVPDs and IVPGs in different phases between the HF and control groups, and their correlations with conventional ultrasound parameters were analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nIVPDs and IVPGs in heart failure group were significantly reduced compared with the control group especially in isovolumic relaxation phase(all P<0.001). IVPDs and IVPGs showed a decreasing trend in the control group, HFmrEF group and the HFrEF group(P<0.001). IVPDs and IVPGs were correlated with LVID, LVMI, ESV, LVEF, GLS and E/e′ (all P<0.01), among which IVPD-IR and IVPG-IR were best correlated. IVPD-IR and IVPG-IR had excellent diagnostic efficacy for HF patients with LVEF<0.5, with cut-off values of <0.73 mmHg (AUC=0.915, P<0.001) and <0.103 mmHg/cm (AUC=0.932, P<0.001), respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nEarly diastolic hemodynamics are severely impaired when systolic function declines.IVPG-IR, as a marker of left ventricular diastolic function, significantly correlates with left ventricular systolic function, and can be used as a potential indicator for assessing left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with heart failure and identifying patients with heart failure. \n \n \nKey words: \nVector flow imaging; Relative pressure imaging; Intraventricular pressure gradients; Heart failure","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the changes of intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs) and intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPGs) in different phases of cardiac cycle in patients with heart failure(HF) patients by relative pressure imaging based on vector flow imaging(VFM).
Methods
Forty-nine HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 0.50 hospitalized in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from November 2018 to January 2019, including thirty-three patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF group) and fifteen patients with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF group), and forty-three controls were enrolled in this study. Clinical data and echocardiographic images were collected and the conventional left ventricular diameter, mass, volume, and systolic and diastolic function parameters were measured. IVPDs and IVPGs during isovolemic systole (IC), rapid ejection (RE), isovolemic diastole (IR), rapid filling (RF) and atrial systole (AC) phases were obtained by the VFM technique. The changes of IVPDs and IVPGs in different phases between the HF and control groups, and their correlations with conventional ultrasound parameters were analyzed.
Results
IVPDs and IVPGs in heart failure group were significantly reduced compared with the control group especially in isovolumic relaxation phase(all P<0.001). IVPDs and IVPGs showed a decreasing trend in the control group, HFmrEF group and the HFrEF group(P<0.001). IVPDs and IVPGs were correlated with LVID, LVMI, ESV, LVEF, GLS and E/e′ (all P<0.01), among which IVPD-IR and IVPG-IR were best correlated. IVPD-IR and IVPG-IR had excellent diagnostic efficacy for HF patients with LVEF<0.5, with cut-off values of <0.73 mmHg (AUC=0.915, P<0.001) and <0.103 mmHg/cm (AUC=0.932, P<0.001), respectively.
Conclusions
Early diastolic hemodynamics are severely impaired when systolic function declines.IVPG-IR, as a marker of left ventricular diastolic function, significantly correlates with left ventricular systolic function, and can be used as a potential indicator for assessing left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with heart failure and identifying patients with heart failure.
Key words:
Vector flow imaging; Relative pressure imaging; Intraventricular pressure gradients; Heart failure